[Bcop] FW: [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs

[Alvaro Retana (aretana)]

FYI..

Uno de los temas que me hacen pensar sobre todos los esfuerzos
relacionados con BCOP en las diferentes regiones es el tener varios
documentos sobre lo mismo.

Me parece que esta puede ser una buena oportunidad para que personas
interesadas de la región se unan a este "BGP BCOP cross-regional working
group" que está proponiendo Chris.

Alvaro.

On 5/21/14 3:19 PM, "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Thanks for the info Benno! With that also being a fledgling initiative,
>> there is probably no harm in NANOG moving toward that same goal...Now,
>> merging the documents and determining which best practice is in-fact
>>BEST
>> may become interesting, but that is a problem for the future.
>
>Indeed!
>
>From my perspective: After NANOG 61 we should have a good grasp on who
>all from this region is willing and able to participate. At that time
>I suggest that we merge the interested NANOGers with the interested
>RIPE'rs and form one BGP BCOP cross-regional working group to build a
>single document which we can both publish (or we can choose one place
>to publish if that makes more sense)...
>
>I note that the RIPE "IPv6 Helpdesk" BCOP is being written using a
>similar model, with folks from both regions working together to draft
>a single document.
>
>$0.02
>~Chris
>
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With the last RIPE68 meeting, a BGP configuration BCOP proposal was
>>> presented by Francios Contat, see
>>> https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/.
>>>
>>> In the slides, Francios explained their approach: get ISPs on board,
>>> definitions, scenarios, good practices, etc. The presentation was a
>>>call for
>>> interest for others to join. Next is to redefine goals, scope, etc.,
>>>such
>>> that it will become a manageable document. Work to obtain input,
>>>review,
>>> collect comments will take place in the RIPE Routing Working Group.
>>>
>>> The document already available is in French, but Google translate does
>>>a
>>> good job to obtain an English version.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Benno Overeinder
>>>
>>>
>>> Op 21 mei 2014 om 17:35 heeft Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com>
>>>het
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> Ahoy There!
>>>  Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through
>>>the
>>> NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified
>>>a
>>> stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are
>>>using as
>>> seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of
>>> questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to
>>>turn up
>>> and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is
>>>already a
>>> "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the
>>> works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on
>>> display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our
>>>goal is
>>> to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this
>>> problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the
>>>"eBGP
>>> Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your
>>> expertise across the internet!
>>>
>>> THANKS!
>>> Bill Armstrong
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>> I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have
>>> questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a
>>>chat!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> BCOP mailing list
>>> BCOP at mailman.nanog.org
>>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BCOP mailing list
>> BCOP at mailman.nanog.org
>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>@ChrisGrundemann
>http://chrisgrundemann.com
>_______________________________________________
>BCOP mailing list
>BCOP at mailman.nanog.org
>http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop