<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Nicolás,</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>No te había entendido.</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Pensaba que querías las diferencias entre el RFC3177 y el RFC6177, no entre el draf del RFC y el RFC mismo.</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>No creo que existan diferencias entre la ultima versión del draft (01) y el RFC. Hay herramientas para ver diferencias entre drafts, pero no he visto entre drafts y RFCs, quizá alguien más sepa.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites-01">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites-01</a></div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Lo único que se me ocurre es un diff manual.</div><div><br></div><div>Slds,</div><div>.as</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:18, Nicolás Ruiz wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Arturo Servin <<a href="mailto:aservin@lacnic.net">aservin@lacnic.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> Si, el RFC6177 es una actualización del 6177.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> La introducción del 6177 habla sobre los cambios y las diferencias en general entre ambos documentos.<br></blockquote><br>Ya, es que yo lei el draft y queria saber si valia la pena volver a<br>leer el rfc6177. por eso preguntaba si habia forma de ver los cambios<br>entre el draft y el rfc<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Slds<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">-as<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:00, Nicolás Ruiz wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Este es RFC que resultó de<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites</a><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">correcto? Hay alguna forma de saber que cambió entre una version del<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">draft y la edición final del RFC?<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">nicolas<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Arturo Servin <<a href="mailto:aservin@lacnic.net">aservin@lacnic.net</a>> wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Creo que este documento es importante compartir y escuchar opiniones.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Saludos,<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">.asn<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Begin forwarded message:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">From: Fred Baker <<a href="mailto:fred@cisco.com">fred@cisco.com</a>><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Date: 24 October 2010 16:00:46 GMT-02:00<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">To: IPv6 operators forum <<a href="mailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de">ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de</a>><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Subject: draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites WGLC<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Reply-To: <a href="mailto:v6ops@ietf.org">v6ops@ietf.org</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">The IETF IPv6 Operations Working Group is initiating a two week working<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">group last call of<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"> "IPv6 Address Assignment to End Sites", Thomas Narten, Geoff Huston,<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"> Rosalea Roberts<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">In essence, this is a change to the advice that the IETF gave the RIRs in<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">RFC 3177. We had indicated at that time that we believed that allocating a<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">/48 to each end site was important, for various reasons. We at this point<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">believe that a better model allows the LIR to allocate diffrent length<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">prefixes to their customers in accordance with the network's needs.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">If you find issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:v6ops@ietf.org">v6ops@ietf.org</a>.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">LACNOG mailing list<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:LACNOG@lacnic.net">LACNOG@lacnic.net</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog">https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">LACNOG mailing list<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:LACNOG@lacnic.net">LACNOG@lacnic.net</a><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog">https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog</a><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">LACNOG mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:LACNOG@lacnic.net">LACNOG@lacnic.net</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog">https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>