<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><div>Estimados todos,</div><div><br></div><div><div>Hay una hoja de cálculo en <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit#gid=0">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit#gid=0</a> y me gustaría sus contribuciones.</div><div><br></div><div>Solo hay unas pocas tecnologías enumeradas (dual stack, NAT64, 464xlat, 6rd, DS-Lite, MAP). ¿Hay otros en uso en esta región?</div></div><div><br></div><div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="es">Incluso si no escribe en v6ops, me gustaría saber más de la región.</span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><br></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">—</span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">There's a spreadsheet at (the link above) and I would like your contributions.</span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><br></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">Only a few technologies are listed </span>(dual stack, NAT64, 464xlat, 6rd, DS-Lite, MAP). Are others in use in this region?</div><div><br></div><div>Even if you don’t write to v6ops, I would like to know more from this region.</div><div><span class="" lang="es"><br></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">—</span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><br></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><span id="result_box" class="" lang="pt"><span class="">Há uma planilha em (o link acima) e eu gostaria de suas contribuições.</span><br><br><span class="">Somente algumas tecnologias estão listadas (dual stack, NAT64, 464xlat, 6rd, DS-Lite, MAP).</span> <span class="">Outros são usados nesta região?</span><br><br><span class="">Mesmo que você não escreva para o v6ops, eu gostaria de saber mais desta região.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><span class="" lang="pt"><span class=""><br></span></span></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><span class="" lang="pt"><span class="">—</span></span></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><span class="" lang="pt"><span class=""><br></span></span></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">Gracias e obrigado, </span></div><div><span class="" lang="es"><br></span></div><div><span class="" lang="es">Lee</span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On 1/19/18, 3:31 PM, "LACNOG on behalf of Azael Fernandez Alcantara" <<a href="mailto:lacnog-bounces@lacnic.net">lacnog-bounces@lacnic.net</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:afaza@unam.mx">afaza@unam.mx</a>> wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>FYI,</div><div><br></div><div>Input from our region is missing !!</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>BEST,</div><div>SALUDOS,</div><div>_______</div><div>Azael</div><div>UNAM</div><div>Mexico</div><div><br></div><div>---------- Forwarded message ----------</div><div>Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:15:48 -0600</div><div>From: Lee Howard <<a href="mailto:lee@asgard.org">lee@asgard.org</a>></div><div>To: <a href="mailto:v6ops@ietf.org">v6ops@ietf.org</a></div><div>Subject: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The WG Chairs were discussing the various transition technologies at some</div><div>length today.</div><div>I mentioned a previous conversation in another forum that led to this list</div><div>of networks and their mechanisms:</div><div><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK</a></div><div>9vcVApc/edit#gid=0</div><div>(Corrections and additions encouraged, especially with links)</div><div><br></div><div>Our impression was that of the 26+ transition mechanisms defined, only a few</div><div>have any modern relevance (editorial comments are mine, not consensus</div><div>positions):</div><div>6rd. It may be that its light is waning, with early deployments moving to</div><div>native IPv6, and no new deployments.</div><div>DS-Lite. Widely deployed, existing support among home gateway</div><div>manufacturers.</div><div>NAT64/464xlat. Implies NAT64, SIIT, which may be used elsewhere. Handset</div><div>CLATs. No home gateway CLAT yet.</div><div>MAP-T. Announced trials and lots of buzz, but no large-scale deployments,</div><div>no home gateway support yet.</div><div>MAP-E. Some buzz, no announced trials or deployments, no home gateway</div><div>support yet.</div><div>Native dual-stack. Still the gold standard, but doesn’t solve IPv4 address</div><div>shortage.</div><div><br></div><div>(Note that “yet” may change at any time).</div><div>As a matter of discussion, do you agree?</div><div>To guide our work, is there work we should do to document or deprecate any</div><div>of these?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Lee</div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>v6ops mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:v6ops@ietf.org">v6ops@ietf.org</a></div><div><a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops</a></div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>LACNOG mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:LACNOG@lacnic.net">LACNOG@lacnic.net</a></div><div><a href="https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog">https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog</a></div><div>Cancelar suscripcion: <a href="https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog">https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog</a></div><div><br></div></blockquote></body></html>