[LAC-TF] Fwd: RFC 6180 on Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms during IPv6 Deployment

[Alejandro Acosta]

Arturo,
  Mil gracias por enviar el documento. Desde mi punto de vista el
mismo es sumamente completo y la redaccion es muy digerible. 100%
recomendable. Les dejo el link una vez mas:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6180.txt

Saludos,

Alejandro,

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Arturo Servin <aservin at lacnic.net> wrote:
>
> Nuevo RFC relacionado con IPv6. Creo que puede ser buena lectura para la
> gente que recien se incorpora al barco de la adopción de IPv4.
> Saludos,
> .as
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Date: 27 May 2011 19:54:25 CDT
> To: ietf-announce at ietf.org, rfc-dist at rfc-editor.org
> Cc: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Subject: RFC 6180 on Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms during
> IPv6 Deployment
>
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
>        RFC 6180
>
>        Title:      Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition
>                    Mechanisms during IPv6 Deployment
>        Author:     J. Arkko, F. Baker
>        Status:     Informational
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       May 2011
>        Mailbox:    jari.arkko at piuha.net,
>                    fred at cisco.com
>        Pages:      20
>        Characters: 49679
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>
>        I-D Tag:    draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines-14.txt
>
>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6180.txt
>
> The Internet continues to grow beyond the capabilities of IPv4.  An
> expansion in the address space is clearly required.  With its
> increase in the number of available prefixes and addresses in a
> subnet, and improvements in address management, IPv6 is the only real
> option on the table.  Yet, IPv6 deployment requires some effort,
> resources, and expertise.  The availability of many different
> deployment models is one reason why expertise is required.  This
> document discusses the IPv6 deployment models and migration tools,
> and it recommends ones that have been found to work well in
> operational networks in many common situations.  This document
> is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
> published for informational purposes.
>
>
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LACTF mailing list
> LACTF at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
>
>