[LAC-TF] Fwd: [v6ops] In the vein of of the icp/dc guidance

[Alejandro Acosta]

Muy buena!.... interesante la lámina que indica: "Why skip dual-stack?"

Copy/Paste de la presentación:

• DS implies lots of unwanted complexity
• More ACLs, monitoring, troubleshooting,
possible failures, training, documentation, ...
• Saves lots of precious IPv4 addresses
• 1 IPv4 per service, rather than 1+ per server
• Forces sysadmins to learn and use IPv6
• They resist change and new technologies
• Provision dual-stack and they'll use IPv4 only
• Perform a single IPv6 migration project

  Indiscutiblemente hay muchos escenarios y los métodos de transición
no son iguales en todos, Yo oriento lo anterior más en aquellas
regiones (ej: APNIC) donde IPv4 ya es sumamente escaso y dejar
DualStack siempre que sea posible.
  Aprovecho para informar que en FLIP6 en Quito habrá una presentación
sobre IPv6 en redes moviles llamada: "IPv6-only services: a mobile
provider's perspective"

Saludos,

Alejandro Acosta,






On 4/17/12, Arturo Servin <aservin at lacnic.net> wrote:
>
> Se me hizo una presentación muy interesante de compartir.
>
> Slds
> as
>
> Sent from my mobile device
> (please excuse typoss and brevit.)
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Joel jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com>
>> Date: 17 April 2012 14:37:34 GMT-03:00
>> To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops at ietf.org>
>> Subject: [v6ops] In the vein of of the icp/dc guidance
>>
>> This was presented at ripe64.
>>
>> https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/67-20120417-RIPE64-The_Case_for_IPv6_Only_Data_Centres.pdf
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>