[LAC-TF] Previa al RFC8064 (Fwd: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48)
fgont at si6networks.com
Tue Feb 21 23:30:06 BRT 2017
Por si Ud. se estaba preguntando que estaba haciendo el 6man wg de
mientras que se eliminaba al principio "end to end" de IPv6 (<>), les
estabamos decidiendo a quien podía yo incluir en los "Acks"
del inminente RFC8064.
Si vos te preguntas porqué IPv6 ha tenido todos los problemas que se le
han encontrado, o estas sudando (y maldiciendo) con su despliegue, tal
vez ahora algunas cosas te queden mas en claro. :-)
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:43:31 -0800
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6 at ietf.org>
CC: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com>
I went through the responses to the call regarding
<draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> . The question in the email was:
Please respond with either support or non-support for this proposed
18 February 2017. I think it is unfortunate to add extra delay over
change, but after consulting with our AD, I think the best course is
to ask the
My summary of the responses is:
Fred Baker non-support
Lorenzo Colitti non-support
Enno Rey support
Brian Carpenter Doesn’t think it’s a w.g. decision
Joel Halpern non-support
Sander Steffan support
Roland Bless non-support
Alexandre Petrescu non-support
神明達哉 Didn’t indicate a position
By my count there is 6 non-support and 2 in support of the
acknowledgement paragraph (not counting the response from the authors
Fernando and Alissa).
Based on this, Suresh should notify the RFC Editor to remove the
> On Feb 11, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com> wrote:
> <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> is currently in AUTH48. According to the datatracker it has been in the RFC Editor queue for 54 days. Everything is done, except there is an impasse over a change to the Acknowledgement Section. One of the authors has proposed adding:
> Fernando Gont would like to thank Nelida Garcia and Guillermo Daniel
> Gont for their love and support, and Jorge Oscar Gont and Diego
> Armando Maradona for their inspiration.
> Some of the other authors don’t think this change is appropriate for AUTH48, but the author proposing this has insisted on adding this text.
> Please respond with either support or non-support for this proposed change by 18 February 2017. I think it is unfortunate to add extra delay over this change, but after consulting with our AD, I think the best course is to ask the working group.
> Bob (Document Shepard)
More information about the LACTF