[LAC-TF] Fwd: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10
Octavio Alvarez
octallac at alvarezp.org
Thu Sep 28 23:05:33 BRT 2017
Bah... No le demos mayor difusión a este troll, por favor.
Saludos.
On 09/28/2017 02:54 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> P.S.: No, no te pegó mal. :-)
> ---------- Mensaje reenviado ----------
> De: "Khaled Omar" <eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com
> <mailto:eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com>>
> Fecha: 28 sept. 2017 4:38 p. m.
> Asunto: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10
> Para: "Joe Touch" <touch at strayalpha.com <mailto:touch at strayalpha.com>>
> Cc: "int-area" <int-area at ietf.org <mailto:int-area at ietf.org>>
>
> Sorry, I forgot to Cc the int-area mailing list, but I forwarded it
> before you remind me.____
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> *From:*Joe Touch [mailto:touch at strayalpha.com
> <mailto:touch at strayalpha.com>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:36 PM
> *To:* Khaled Omar
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10____
>
> __ __
>
> Please post to the list. I do not want to engage in offline
> discussions.____
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Khaled Omar
> <eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com <mailto:eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com>>
> wrote:____
>
> Do we need to change the whole I-D to refer to the new name or
> the contents remains the same except replacing IPv10 to IPmix or
> IPf?____
>
> ____
>
> ____
>
> ____
>
> *From:*Joe Touch [mailto:touch at strayalpha.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:29 PM
> *To:* Khaled Omar
> *Cc:* int-area
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10____
>
> ____
>
> ____
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Khaled Omar
> <eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com
> <mailto:eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com>> wrote:____
>
> Then I think IPmix can be the name or IPf as suggested by
> stewart. ____
>
> ____
>
> Yes, those are ok IMO.____
>
>
>
>
> ____
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10
> From: Joe Touch
> To: Khaled Omar
> CC: Behcet Sarikaya ,int-area
>
>
>
> ____
>
> No, IMO.____
>
> ____
>
> It still refers to a codepoint.____
>
> ____
>
> Joe____
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 8:23 PM, Khaled Omar
> <eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com
> <mailto:eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com>> wrote:____
>
> Can we use IPvTen? ____
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10
> From: Behcet Sarikaya
> To: Joe Touch
> CC: Khaled Omar ,int-area
>
>
>
> ____
>
> ____
>
> ____
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Joe Touch
> <touch at strayalpha.com
> <mailto:touch at strayalpha.com>> wrote:____
>
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Khaled Omar
> <eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com
> <mailto:eng.khaled.omar at hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I still didn't recognize what is the
> problem of version number 10
>
> That number is assigned by IANA if - and
> only when - a protocol proposal qualifies
> for that assignment.
>
> You don’t have that assignment, so you
> should stop using it even as a name.____
>
> ____
>
> You can say version number TBD____
>
> and in IANA Considerations section say IANA to
> assign a number to TBD and say 10 is preferred.____
>
> ____
>
> Regards,____
>
> Behcet____
>
> Joe____
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org <mailto:Int-area at ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>____
>
> ____
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org <mailto:Int-area at ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>____
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area at ietf.org <mailto:Int-area at ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LACTF mailing list
> LACTF at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
> Cancelar suscripcion: lactf-unsubscribe at lacnic.net
>
More information about the LACTF
mailing list