<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Si no me equivoco esto es lo que se está discutiendo:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic/">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic/</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-00">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-00</a></div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Basicamente, lo hacemos obsoleto o lo arreglamos.</div><div><br></div><div>Saludos,</div><div>.as</div><br><div><div>On 6 Apr 2011, at 20:52, Azael Fernandez Alcantara wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Buen Dia,<br><br>He estado siguiendo los comentarios al respecto en la lista de la IETF, estuve en la pasada reunion y aun no hay una decision (redaccion) final, vamos a esperar y a opinar al respecto.<br>Pero si hay que reconsiderar el uso de 6to4, de acuerdo al contexto, y a<br>emitir recomendaciones al respecto.<br><br>Seria bueno saber el estado del uso de 6to4 en la region, ya que en la liga que mando Arturo Servin, no ubico a alguno en LA:<br><a href="http://stats.ottix.net/ipv6/">http://stats.ottix.net/ipv6/</a><br><br>En nuesto caso, si lo hemos y continuado utilizando en algunos contextos.<br><br>SALUDOS<br>____________________________________<br>Azael<br>___________________________________<br>Mensaje enviado sin acentos<br><br>On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Nicolas Antoniello wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite">FYI<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">From: Christopher Palmer <Christopher.Palmer@microsoft.com><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 19:43<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Subject: [v6ops] Deprecating 2002::/16 - 6to4 Historic Status<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">In “Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Historic status”<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">There is this recommendation:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">IANA is requested to mark the 2002::/16 prefix as "deprecated",<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> pointing to this document. Reassignment of the prefix for any usage<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> requires justification via an IETF Standards Action [RFC5226].<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">It is not clear why this is necessary.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">If major vendors were to disable 6to4 by default, that would fix the<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">brokenness issue, while still allow for this prefix to be used in<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">specialized or enthusiast scenarios. Isn’t any other action overkill?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Thanks!<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">----------------------------<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Christopher.Palmer@Microsoft.com<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Program Manager<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">IPv6 @ Windows<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">v6ops mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">v6ops@ietf.org<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br>LACTF mailing list<br>LACTF@lacnic.net<br>https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf<br></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>