<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Lo más interesante que me pasó es que me saltó el siguiente aviso:<br>
<div class="veil-message">
<blockquote>
<h4 class="clearfix text-c">Here’s The Thing With Ad Blockers</h4>
<hr>
<p class="link-underline-sm clearfix text-c"><span class="black">We
get it:</span> Ads aren’t what you’re here for. But ads help
us keep the lights on. <br>
So, add us to your ad blocker’s <a onclick='var
x=".tl(";s_objectID="http://www.wired.com/whitelist-wired/_1";return
this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true'
href="http://www.wired.com/whitelist-wired/"
class="inline-block" target="_blank"
data-js="whitelist-link">whitelist</a> or pay $1 per week
for an ad-free version of WIRED. Either way, you are
supporting our journalism. We’d really appreciate it.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
es decir, no puedo ir a Wired si no pago o si no me dejo
(rastrear)....<br>
<br>
¿alguien me transcribe el texto del artículo sobre netflix?<br>
<br>
gracias!<br>
<br>
ariel<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 28/03/16 a las 16:52, Fabián Mejía
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56F98B81.2050206@gmail.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hola a todos
Interesante lectura para iniciar la semana:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.wired.com/2016/03/netflix-no-net-neutrality-hypocrite-slowing-video/">http://www.wired.com/2016/03/netflix-no-net-neutrality-hypocrite-slowing-video/</a>
Netflix, one of the most outspoken corporate champions of net
neutrality, admitted this week that it sends lower quality video to
mobile subscribers on AT&T and Verizon’s networks.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>