[LACNIC/Seguridad] Fwd: Revision of the IPv6 Firewalls document (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt)

[Edwin Salazar]

excelente iniciativa y documento Fernando.
En una revision rapida no encontre que se soporte tambien protocolos de
ruteo, bgp, ospf, seria conveniente incluirlos.

edwin.-

El jueves, 17 de abril de 2014, Fernando Gont <fgont en si6networks.com>
escribió:

> Estimados,
>
> FYI:
> <
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt
> >
>
> Este documento esta siendo discutido en la lista del opsec wg de IETF
> (<opsec en ietf.org <javascript:;>>, <
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>).
>
> En particular si son operadores, estaría bueno recibir sus comentarios y
> feedback.
>
> Saludos, y gracias!
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Revision of the IPv6 Firewalls document (Fwd: New Version
> Notification for draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt)
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:55:27 -0300
> From: Fernando Gont <fgont en si6networks.com <javascript:;>>
> To: 'opsec en ietf.org <javascript:;>' <opsec en ietf.org <javascript:;>>
>
> Folks,
>
> We have published a revision of the IPv6 firewalls I-D. Please find it
> at:
> <
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt
> >.
>
> We have incorporated virtually all the comments received so far... which
> have been a lot (both on- and off-list).
>
> Among the changes are:
>
> * We have clarified the requirements language.
>
> * We have clarified some of the existing requirements, and addded new ones.
>
> * We have incorporated many references that were missing in the -00
> version.
>
> * We incorporated some words in the area of performance -- which tends
> to be pretty critical, as has been shown during the Berlin ipv6hackers
> meeting last year.
>
>
> If you provided feedback on the -00 version of the I-D, please do let us
> know if we have addressed your comments. If you haven't provided
> feedback on the -00 version, please do it for this one (-01).
>
> Thanks!
> Best regards,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:47:29 -0700
> From: internet-drafts en ietf.org <javascript:;>
> To: Will Liu <liushucheng en huawei.com <javascript:;>>, "Shucheng LIU
> (Will)"
> <liushucheng en huawei.com <javascript:;>>, Fernando Gont <
> fgont en si6networks.com <javascript:;>>,
> "Fernando Gont" <fgont en si6networks.com <javascript:;>>, Marco Ermini
> <marco.ermini en resmed.com <javascript:;>>, "Marco Ermini" <
> marco.ermini en resmed.com <javascript:;>>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Fernando Gont and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs
> Revision:       01
> Title:          Requirements for IPv6 Enterprise Firewalls
> Document date:  2014-04-16
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          18
> URL:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs/
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs-01
>
> Abstract:
>    While there has been some work in the area of firewalls, concrete
>    requirements for IPv6 firewalls have never been specified in the RFC
>    series.  The more limited experience with the IPv6 protocols and the
>    more reduced number of firewalls that support IPv6 has made it rather
>    difficult to infer what are reasonable features to expect in an IPv6
>    firewall.  This has typically been a problem for network operators,
>    who typically have to produce a "Request for Proposal" from scratch
>    that describes such features.  This document specifies a set of
>    requirements for IPv6 firewalls, in order to establish some common-
>    ground in terms of what features can be expected in them.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seguridad mailing list
> Seguridad en lacnic.net <javascript:;>
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/seguridad
>
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/seguridad/attachments/20140417/2e998d7f/attachment.html>