[LACNIC/Seguridad] Revision de RFC4941 (direcciones IPv6 temorales) (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11.txt)

Fernando Gont fgont en si6networks.com
Vie Oct 2 04:16:18 -03 2020


Estimados,

FYI: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11

Tal como lo menciona la Section 7, ya tenemos tres implementaciones de 
este document. Florian Obser hizo la de OPenBSD, y yo las de Linux y 
FreeBSD. OpenBSD y LInux Kernel ya las tienen comiteadas en el fuente.

Maridese con: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNW4LamM1O0

Saludos cordiales,
Fernando




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11.txt
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:50:16 -0700
From: internet-drafts en ietf.org
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh en kaloom.com>, Fernando Gont 
<fgont en si6networks.com>, Richard Draves <richdr en microsoft.com>, Thomas 
Narten <narten en cs.duke.edu>


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11.txt
has been successfully submitted by Fernando Gont and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis
Revision:	11
Title:		Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address 
Autoconfiguration in IPv6
Document date:	2020-09-30
Group:		6man
Pages:		23
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis/
Htmlized: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11
Diff: 
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-11

Abstract:
    This document describes an extension to IPv6 Stateless Address
    Autoconfiguration that causes nodes to generate global scope
    addresses with randomized interface identifiers that change over
    time.  Changing global scope addresses over time limits the window of
    time during which eavesdroppers and other information collectors may
    trivially perform address-based network activity correlation when the
    same address is employed for multiple transactions by the same node.
    Additionally, it reduces the window of exposure of a node via an
    address that becomes revealed as a result of active communication.
    This document obsoletes RFC4941.

 


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat





Más información sobre la lista de distribución Seguridad