[BCOP] BCOP Draft-2: open for comments

[Lucimara Desiderá]

I will think about a better wording to make explicit the need for IPv6 
in the BCOP.

On 19/06/18 05:02, Jan Zorz - ISOC wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On 18/06/2018 23:31, Lucimara Desiderá wrote:
>> 1) I think this is a bit out of scope of this document especially 
>> because there is an specific BCOP for IPv6 requirements. (Maybe it is 
>> time to update that).
> 
> I tend to disagree. It's a prerequisite, not a requirement. Sort of like 
> for a car, wheels would be a prerequisite, not a requirement. LED 
> headlights can or can't be a requirement, but without wheels that's not 
> a proper car anymore.
> 
> Cheers, Jan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BCOP mailing list
> BCOP at lacnog.org
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/bcop