[Ietf-lac] BOFs Aprovados para el IETF 88 (Vancouver)

[Alejandro Acosta]

Gracias!.., a pesar de que quizas no se forme un wg veo muy
interesante este para estos tiempos que vivimos (claro, desde mi punto
de vista)

"
Security
PerPass? (approved)

    Status: Approved
    Long name and abbreviation: PerPass? - Handling Pervasive
Monitoring in the IETF
    Not WG-forming
    Responsible AD: Stephen Farrell
    Number of people expected to attend: Loads, say 400. (More
surreptitiously;-)
    Length of session: 2, or 2.5 hours
    Conflicts to avoid (whole Areas and/or WGs): SEC sessions, area meetings
    Does it require WebEX? No.
    Does it require Meetecho? Yes please.
    Mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

The perpass BoF is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF
protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. The BOF
is not intended to be a precursor to formation of a Working Group, but
rather to (for example) discuss ways in which IETF protocols at any
layer can be made more robust against pervasive passive monitoring. If
subsequent protocol work is to be done in the IETF, that would likely
happen in existing or new protocol-specific Working Groups.

Logistics note: The tech plenary will also discuss this topic, so this
has to follow that but ideally with a session or overnight in between.
This should also be before saag. This might need the biggest breakout
we have.
"

Saludos,

On 9/24/13, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana at cisco.com> wrote:
> Aquí está la lista de los 11 (!) BOFs que fueron aprobados para Vancouver.
> Un par pueden convertirse en Grupos de Trabajo nuevos incluso antes de la
> reunión.
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/
>
> Alvaro.
>


-- 
=====
^A.......o$