[Ietf-lac] RFC8981 y el maradonianismo (Fwd: Fwd: RFC 8981 on Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6)

Mon Mar 1 00:16:45 -03 2021

Fernando,

felicidades. La sola presentación del draft es un hito personal y profesional importante. Una parte de la que no se suele hablar - en la academia tampoco es tan explícita - es el reconocimiento que implica el que estés como autor junto con algunas personas muy reconocidas en la IETF, pilares, representantes, y miembros muy antiguos. Eso no da puntos pero cuenta mucho para el observador entrenado.

Ojalá ahora puedas hacerlos valer en formas como que adopten estudiantes latinoamericanos en sus universidades o los empleen en sus empresas; den conferencias y cursos orientados a la región; y otras formas orgánicas de impulsar la participación sustantiva. Si puedo ayudar (por ejemplo con Thomas Narten), con gusto.

Saludos

Alejandro Pisanty
________________________________________
De: Ietf-lac <ietf-lac-bounces at lacnog.org> en nombre de Fernando Gont <fgont at si6networks.com>
Enviado: domingo, 28 de febrero de 2021 08:28 p. m.
Para: Lista para discusión de seguridad en redes y sistemas informaticos de la región; lactf at lacnic.net
Cc: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network Operators Group; <ietf-lac at lacnog.org>
Asunto: [Ietf-lac] RFC8981 y el maradonianismo (Fwd: Fwd: RFC 8981 on Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6)

Estimados/as,

FYI: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8981
(mas abajo podrán encontrar un resumen técnico)

Hace un poco más de 20 años atrás, estaba todavia en el colegio
secundario, y habia empezado a leer RFCs de IETF -- con algo de
frustración al ver que no habían RFCs con autores de la región.

Pasó mucho tiempo (y muchas cosas) desde ahí... desde empezar a escribir
un primer internet-draft, a pedir dinero prestado para poder asistir a
mi primera reunión, renunciar a trabajos para poder hacer ingenieria de
Internet (con un futuro verdaderamente incierto :-) ), y otras tantas
cosas más.

Los tiempos luego cambiaron, pero algunas cosas no: las reglas y los
obstacúlos para participar en IETF jamas fueron los mismos para quienes
veniamos del c* del mundo -- o, mejor dicho, para quienes no
pertenecemos a la comunidad dominante de IETF (ver
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gont-diversity-analysis-00).

En todo este tiempo, Diego Maradona fue un motivador imprescindible...
en particular ante situaciones adversas.

A poco mas de tres meses de habernos dejado físicamente, mi guiño
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8981.html#name-authors-addresses ) a
quien fuera distinguido como "Maestro Inspirador de los Soñadores"
[Oxford] [Forbes].

La vida no es la misma sin el Diego.

[Oxford]
https://www.tiempoar.com.ar/nota/de-villa-fiorito-a-oxford-cuando-maradona-fue-maestro-inspirador-de-suenos-en-inglaterra

[Forbes]
https://www.forbesargentina.com/today/murio-diego-maradona-hombre-invento-asi-mismo-llego-lo-mas-alto-convirtio-maestro-inspirador-sonadores-n4615

Saludos cordiales,
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: RFC 8981 on Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 22:41:05 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont at si6networks.com>
To: IPv6 Hackers Mailing List <ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com>

Folks,

RFC 8981, entitled "Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration in IPv6", has finally been published:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8981

It has been the product of over four years of work.

It is revision of RFC4941 -- the so called "IPv6 temporary addresses",
also known as "IPv6 Privacy Addresses".

This revision does a number of interesting things, including:

* It employs a different algorithms for generating the Interface
Identifiers (IIDs)

* Addresses issues present in RFC4941, such as re-using the same
interface identifier across different prefixes

* The lifetimes of temporary addresses are reduced, thus reducing the
average number of addresses that may be in use at any given time.

* The lifetime of addresses is randomized, such that it's harder to
infer when addresses are re-generated.

Thanks,
Fernando

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RFC 8981 on Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration in IPv6
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:29:06 -0800 (PST)
From: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
To: ietf-announce at ietf.org, rfc-dist at rfc-editor.org
CC: drafts-update-ref at iana.org, ipv6 at ietf.org, rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

                 RFC 8981

         Title:      Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless
   Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6         Author:     F. Gont,
                     S. Krishnan,
                     T. Narten,
                     R. Draves
         Status:     Standards Track
         Stream:     IETF
         Date:       February 2021
         Mailbox:    fgont at si6networks.com,
                     suresh at kaloom.com,
                     narten at cs.duke.edu,
                     richdr at microsoft.com
         Pages:      20
         Obsoletes:  RFC 4941

         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-12.txt

         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8981

         DOI:        10.17487/RFC8981

This document describes an extension to IPv6 Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration that causes hosts to generate temporary addresses
with randomized interface identifiers for each prefix advertised with
autoconfiguration enabled. Changing addresses over time limits the
window of time during which eavesdroppers and other information
collectors may trivially perform address-based network-activity
correlation when the same address is employed for multiple
transactions by the same host. Additionally, it reduces the window of
exposure of a host as being accessible via an address that becomes
revealed as a result of active communication. This document obsoletes
RFC 4941.

This document is a product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the
IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for
the standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.

The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

_____________________________________________
Ietf-lac mailing list
Ietf-lac at lacnog.org
Cancelar suscripcion: ietf-lac-unsubscribe at lacnog.org