[lacnog] Discusion: la posicion del IETF sobre los acuerdos de priorizacion paga de trafico

[Jorge Amodio]

2010/9/3 Carlos Marcelo Martinez Cagnazzo <carlosm3011 en gmail.com>:
> Queria compartir una discusión que esta ocurriendo en ISOC sobre la posicion
> que tiene o deberia tener el IETF sobre los acuerdos de prioritización paga
> de tráfico.

Russ Housley (actual Chair de IETF) envio un mensaje aclarando con
mayor detalle, que los comentarios vertidos en el articulo relacionado
con Net Neutrality fueron su propia opinion y no la posicion de IETF o
algo parecido.

Este fue el mensaje de Russ al respecto:

>I want the whole community to be aware of the comments that I made to
>the press yesterday.  Clearly, these comments do not represent IETF
>consensus in any way.  They are my opinion, and the reporter was told to
>express them as my opinion.
>
>One thing that I said was not captured quite right.  The article says:
>"With services that require certain speeds to operate smoothly, such as
>Internet telephony, calls are given precedence over TV, Housley said."
>I actually said that DiffServ can be used to make sure that traffic
>associated with applications that require timely delivery, like voice
>and video, to give preference over traffic associated with applications
>without those demands, like email.
>
>The whole article is copied below, and it is online here:
>http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/tc_20100902_7144.php
>
>Russ

Saludos
Jorge