[lacnog] [LACNIC/Seguridad] Fwd: IPv6 NAT (NAT66) - Implementations?

[Arturo Servin]

	Bueno, siempre hay un roto para un descosido …  =)

	Además:
"
As already mentioned, pf does NAPT66 and even the version in NetBSD-4 is new
enough to likely do that without undue surprises.

ipfilter NAT accomodates IPv6 addresses, so may do NAPT66 as well.

NetBSD npf is likely to grow NPT66 by ~September. This may come in the
form of a bpf application.

MAP66 (http://sourceforge.net/projects/map66/) is an implementation of an
older version of the NPT66 draft for Linux netfilter.

"

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pf.conf



Slds,
as

On 18 Apr 2011, at 11:41, Fernando Gont wrote:

> Como dijo Smith, "Faith, it seems... doesn't come without a sense of
> irony"... ;-)
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Kamichoff <prox en prolixium.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:09:04 -0400
> Subject: Re: IPv6 NAT (NAT66) - Implementations?
> To: Gert Doering <gert en space.net>
> Cc: ipv6-ops en lists.cluenet.de
> 
> Hi Gert -
> 
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> What sort of "NAT style" does the SRX do?  N:1 with port translation,
>> or N:N prefix translation (NPT66)?
> 
> It actually supports both as of Junos 10.2R2.  N:N host/prefix
> translation /and/ N:1 with port translation.  And with the port
> translation some ALGs are supported, too.. FTP worked, surprisingly :)
> 
> - Mark
> 
> -- 
> Mark Kamichoff
> prox en prolixium.com
> http://www.prolixium.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Seguridad mailing list
> Seguridad en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/seguridad

------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20110418/a88e2398/attachment.html>