[lacnog] ITU/IETF OAM for MPLS (Fwd: My comments to the press about OAM for MPLS)

Arturo Servin arturo.servin en gmail.com
Jue Mar 3 09:14:45 BRT 2011

	Interesante que en el artículo de http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2011/03.aspx dice: 

"However this crucial technical input was not provided and the IETF’s MPLS-TP Interoperability Design Team (MEAD) was unilaterally disbanded by IETF in October 2009"

	Pero en un correo reciente en la lista del IETF http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65679.html  :

"On Monday October 5th an email was sent to mead en ietf.org
announcing the disbanding of the MEAD team, and that the
meeting in Munich should not be considered a MEAD team meeting.

The decision to disband the MEAD team was liaised to the ITU-T
on the same day (October 5).

	Hagan sus propios juicios.


On 3 Mar 2011, at 09:57, Fernando Gont wrote:

> FYI, comentarios del chair de la IETF.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: My comments to the press about OAM for MPLS
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:15:05 -0500
> From: Russ Housley <housley en vigilsec.com>
> To: IETF <ietf en ietf.org>
> I want the whole community to be aware of the comments that I made to
> the press over the past few days.  Last Friday, the ITU-T Study Group 15
> decided to move forward with an OAM solution that is incompatible with
> the work being done in the IETF MPLS WG.  This is a breach of the
> agreement reached by the IETF and the ITU-T, which is published in RFC 5317.
> The ITU-T press release about their action is here:
>  http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2011/03.aspx
> On behalf of the IETF, ISOC helped get the word out:
>  http://isoc.org/wp/newsletter/?p=3287
> The press is starting to cover the story:
>  http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/ietf-slams-itu-standards-vote-22392
>  http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=8B71BD58-1A64-6A71-CE24B4B4EB59B200
> And, the ITU-T made a second announcement today:
> http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/newslog/Experts+Cast+Doubt+On+Jeopardize+Internet+Statement.aspx
> I expect that there will be more press coverage of this unfortunate
> situation.
> Thanks,
>  Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf en ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog

------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20110303/134f9416/attachment.html>

Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG