[lacnog] [SPAM]Fwd: draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites WGLC

[Arturo Servin]

	Si, el RFC6177 es una actualización del 6177.

	La introducción del 6177 habla sobre los cambios y las diferencias en general entre ambos documentos.

Slds	
-as
	
	

On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:00, Nicolás Ruiz wrote:

> Este es RFC que resultó de
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites
> 
> correcto? Hay alguna forma de saber que cambió entre una version del
> draft y la edición final del RFC?
> 
> nicolas
> 
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Arturo Servin <aservin en lacnic.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Creo que este documento es importante compartir y escuchar opiniones.
>> Saludos,
>> .asn
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Fred Baker <fred en cisco.com>
>> Date: 24 October 2010 16:00:46 GMT-02:00
>> To: IPv6 operators forum <ipv6-ops en lists.cluenet.de>
>> Subject: draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites WGLC
>> Reply-To: v6ops en ietf.org
>> 
>> The IETF IPv6 Operations Working Group is initiating a two week working
>> group last call of
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites
>>  "IPv6 Address Assignment to End Sites", Thomas Narten, Geoff Huston,
>>  Rosalea Roberts
>> 
>> In essence, this is a change to the advice that the IETF gave the RIRs in
>> RFC 3177. We had indicated at that time that we believed that allocating a
>> /48 to each end site was important, for various reasons. We at this point
>> believe that a better model allows the LIR to allocate diffrent length
>> prefixes to their customers in accordance with the network's needs.
>> 
>> If you find issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding
>> additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to
>> v6ops en ietf.org.
>> 
>> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document
>> as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be
>> of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LACNOG mailing list
>> LACNOG en lacnic.net
>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog