[lacnog] [afnog] IPv 6 Point to Point at /64?

[Sascha E. Pollok]

For many years -be it good or bad but it was quite convenient- we have 
been using /112 for all types of "transfer"(tm) networks. It leaves enough 
room for setting up more than 2-4 hosts in case of VRRPv6 or HSRPv6 or
Anycast setups (in case of a customer connected to redundant PE routers).

Yes, one could argue that a /124 could be enough too but a /126 is a bit
too small. Size does matter sometimes!

Going /112 for all cases of transfer-networks gives room for some 
flexibility.

-Sascha

On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Arturo Servin wrote:

> 
> Muchos creemos que un /126 es suficiente, pero no todos creemos que sea lo más conveniente.
> 
> =D
> 
> 
> /as
> 
> On 5 Jun 2012, at 18:24, Nicolas Antoniello wrote:
>
>       Me es grato saber que no estoy solo en la creencia de que un /126 es
>       suficiente para una PtP !!!