[lacnog] Fwd: RFC 7085 on Top-Level Domains That Are Already Dotless

[Hugo Salgado]

Hola Arturo.
Solo quería dejar en claro que este RFC es "informational" y no
emite juicios de valor técnico sobre la correctitud de tener
registros directos en un tld, *porque no los hay*.

Me preocupa que se empiece a generar una sensación de que estos
tlds están haciendo algo incorrecto.

El asunto con los dotless es que
  - no hay una razón técnica para prohibirlos (de hecho nunca lo
    estuvieron)
  - pese a todo, funcionan
  - PERO... estoy de acuerdo con prohibirlos a los newgtlds, por un tema
    de riesgo.

Saludos,

Hugo
(a título personal, y aclarando que .CL no tiene dotless ;) )


On 12/05/2013 11:53 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> Interesante.
> 
> Slds
> as
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <rfc-editor en rfc-editor.org>
> Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:59 PM
> Subject: RFC 7085 on Top-Level Domains That Are Already Dotless
> To: ietf-announce en ietf.org, rfc-dist en rfc-editor.org
> Cc: drafts-update-ref en iana.org, rfc-editor en rfc-editor.org
> 
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>         RFC 7085
> 
>         Title:      Top-Level Domains That Are Already
>                     Dotless
>         Author:     J. Levine, P. Hoffman
>         Status:     Informational
>         Stream:     Independent
>         Date:       December 2013
>         Mailbox:    standards en taugh.com,
>                     paul.hoffman en cybersecurity.org
>         Pages:      6
>         Characters: 11369
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-hoffine-already-dotless-05.txt
> 
>         URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7085.txt
> 
> Recent statements from the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) and the
> Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Security
> and Stability Advisory Committee have focused on the problems that
> the DNS is likely to experience with top-level domains (TLDs) that
> contain address records (so-called "dotless domains").  In order to
> help researchers determine the extent of the issues with dotless
> domains, this document lists the current dotless TLDs and gives a
> script for finding them.  This document lists data about dotless TLDs
> but does not address the policy and technology issues other than to
> point to the statements of others.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor en rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion: lacnog-unsubscribe en lacnic.net
>