[lacnog] Resumen de LACNOG, Vol 81, Envío 1

[Carlos M. Martinez]

Doug,

Thanks for sharing. I'm not following nanog that closely so I missed your thread. 

Carloa

-----Original Message-----
From: "Doug Madory" <dmadory en renesys.com>
Sent: ‎04/‎09/‎2014 14:51
To: "lacnog en lacnic.net" <lacnog en lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: [lacnog]Resumen de LACNOG, Vol 81, Envío 1

Hi Carlos,

Three days prior to BGPmon's claim to have discovered this IP squatting operation ("case 1"), I detailed it on the Nanog list:

http://seclists.org/nanog/2014/Aug/513

The analysis is very similar, however there was no reference to my work here. Very discouraging.

-Doug Madory

On Sep 4, 2014, at 11:00 AM, lacnog-request en lacnic.net wrote:

> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:46:33 -0300
> From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011 en gmail.com>
> To: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network Operators Group
> 	<lacnog en lacnic.net>
> Subject: [lacnog] De BGPMON: "Using BGP to Find Spammers"
> Message-ID: <54077E29.9050200 en gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> http://www.bgpmon.net/using-bgp-data-to-find-spammers/
> 
> Ademas de ser un trabajo como siempre muy bueno de BGPMon, fijense la
> cantidad de ASes de nuestra región involucrados, en particular de Mexico
> y Argentina.
> 
> También interesante de ver es como los IRRs sin chequeo contra una b. de
> d. de registro pueden ser un arma de doble filo.
> 
> s2
> 
> Carlos

------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20140904/65e38c6a/attachment.html>