[lacnog] IP Squatting en la region?

[Ricardo Patara]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am not sure that is the case but when I read "5.x.x.x" it ring a bell.
There was an NAT equipment from an big manufacturer pre configured
with 5/8 as "internal" network for NATing.
It was a long time ago, not sure this equipment is still on the
market, not sure either this is the case.

Regards,

  Ricardo Patara

On 07/02/15 00:04, Doug Madory wrote:
> Hola Andres,
> 
> I don't see Claro (or any other Colombian provider) globally
> announcing any IP address space in 5.x.x.x range.
> 
> However, they could be internally numbering with this address space
> and that could cause a problem for their customers. There are many
> cases of providers around the world using global IP addresses for
> internal numbering, which is a risky practice.
> 
> Can anyone with Claro Colombia residential service post a
> traceroute to one of the affected IPs? Por ejemplo: 5.9.66.150
> 
> Gracias, Doug
> 
> Doug Madory Director of Internet Analysis, Dyn @dynresearch 
> Hanover, NH                      +1 603-263-6868
> 
> Dyn is a cloud-based Internet Performance company 
> http://dyn.com/about/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ LACNOG mailing
> list LACNOG en lacnic.net 
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog Cancelar
> suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU1pNNAAoJEGUUwTbBsH6WGZgIAJ2gZU3NcQEN3Cjjg6gdvYP8
34BPE9EBPPMq2Xw5w4nL6l18kQjguIFIxgawiA0CV97HBHrMg3mWStdVLSj1JIYt
FEFd4j88uDgzEe0YrHIPWxUWWDLr3T0c68fR/VK1DFC8nSgnVXUqOZeT8puEOdtq
QpyFtjrWH8sc1gxSyC/h0nQ2iGE/ILToMriRen6u9b+lERwwAStnjJBMkGCKkv2+
UlPu59fP8/0T6WXFZYG0tspFOScHoHGQtTVN03nql9KN/MLJu9Dcg+Pp+76l8GSp
qbAxlCOg0wqH2FpDRADSe2YujPTtl0I8gX7456F/3S7DQmzSUWXBTkt7kTBGB+M=
=qFNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----