[lacnog] isoc paper - Addressing the challenge of IP spoofing

[Christian O'Flaherty]

No creo que haya proveedores que intencionalmente permiten ip-spoofing
por cuestiones de negocio. Un DDOS es un problema para todos los
sistemas autónomos por donde pasa el tráfico.

Incluso, en la mayoría de los casos, durará poco y quedará fuera del
percentil 95 que se cobra.

Yo creo que podemos mejorarlo con educación y con proyectos como este:
https://www.routingmanifesto.org

Christian


On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver en thenap.com> wrote:
> Great paper, although you left out that as long as someone is making money either allowing the attacks to be originated by not enabling uRPF (in the case of many hosting companies) or transiting the traffic (How much of this wayward UDP traffic turns into revenue at the carriers?) the incentive profile is upside down.
>
> Many carriers won't filter these attacks upstream because if the traffic doesn't hit your port they can't bill you for it.
>
> So they're making money off of it.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LACNOG [mailto:lacnog-bounces en lacnic.net] On Behalf Of Ricardo Patara
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:38 AM
> To: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network Operators Group <lacnog en lacnic.net>
> Subject: [lacnog] isoc paper - Addressing the challenge of IP spoofing
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/addressing-challenge-ip-spoofing
>
>
> regards,
> --
>   Ricardo Patara
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog