[lacnog] Survey on Internet agreement ecosystem

[Ivan Žilić Schmidt]

Most of the questions do not apply to IXP’s. So, as Bill said, it would be necessary to have a “none of the above” answer.

 

Best Regards,

 

 


  <http://www.pitchile.cl/> 

Ivan Žilić Schmidt

Badajoz 45, piso 17 
Las Condes | Santiago | CHILE
T  56  2  2840  9984  

 

 

From: LACNOG [mailto:lacnog-bounces en lacnic.net] On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
Sent: jueves, 01 de junio de 2017 13:32
To: Pedro de Botelho Marcos <pbmarcos en inf.ufrgs.br>; marco.chiesa en uclouvain.be; lfmuller en inf.ufrgs.br; pradeeban.kathiravelu en tecnico.ulisboa.pt; Marco Canini <marco en kaust.edu.sa>; marinho en inf.ufrgs.br
Cc: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network Operators Group <lacnog en lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: [lacnog] Survey on Internet agreement ecosystem

 





On Jun 1, 2017, at 8:23 PM, Pedro de Botelho Marcos <pbmarcos en inf.ufrgs.br <mailto:pbmarcos en inf.ufrgs.br> > wrote:
 Feel free to drop any comment on how to improve the survey in the future.

 

What fraction of agreements have a Service Level Agreement to be guaranteed? *
Up to 25%
26%-50%
51%-75%
76%-100%

 

Since our recent survey of 1.9M such agreements showed that fewer than 0.07% had any written agreement at all, and fewer than 0.02% had asymmetric terms, you might wish to restructure your options as:

 

0%

Up to 0.01%

0.011% - 0.05%

0.051% - 100%

 

Also, none of your multiple-choice include “none of the above” which seems to be the only correct answer for many of them.

 

                                -Bill




 

------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20170601/e3b9f2e9/attachment.html>