[lacnog] [Ietf-lac] On Techno-Colonialism

[Fernando Gont]

Personalmente no veo ironia alguna.

Por el contrario, me parece hasta destacable que un tipo tenga la
honestidad y el valor de reconocer que lo que él hacía creyendo que
ayudaba a la región, no era tal cosa.

Por mi parte, lo aplaudo.

La ironia real es la que en ocasiones representamos nosotros mismos.

Fijate por ejemplo que en la región se han repetido innumerables veces,
y con total impunidad, numerosas mentiras respecto al funcionamiento de
diversos organismos, tales como IETF, que cualquiera que haya intentado
realizar trabajo desde la region, apartandose del deseo de grandes
fabricantes, sabe como son las cosas.

Sin ir mas lejos, nosotros tenemos reuniones sobre diversidad e
inclusión en.... hoteles 4* en Seul, Tokio, o similares. -- no somos
geniales? :-)

En lo personal, yo escribí unos 30 RFCs para la región, pero usualmente
escucho clases magistrales de porqué no tengo razon en mis
apreciaciones, y sobre "como es participar en IETF desde la region" --
algo que termina siendo funcional a lo mismo de arriba.

Slds,
Fernando




On 05/22/2017 06:37 PM, Tomas Lynch wrote:
> La ironía de que esta persona que era un Do-Gooer nos explique a los
> pobres lo que es el tecnocolonialismo no deja de llamarme la atención.
> 
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont en si6networks.com
> <mailto:fgont en si6networks.com>> wrote:
> 
>     FYI: <https://psg.com/on-technocolonialism.html
>     <https://psg.com/on-technocolonialism.html>>
> 
>     ---- cut here ----
>     On Techno-Colonialism
> 
>         ".. sometimes we visit your country and live in your home,
>          sometimes we ride on your horses, sometimes we walk alone,
>          sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
>          - Grateful Dead - Eyes of the World
> 
>     Techno-colonialism is a term I coined back in the '90s to describe the
>     exploitation of poorer cultures by richer ones through technology. In
>     particular, this was focused on Internet technology, though it may apply
>     more widely. Like ice cream, techno-colonialism comes in many flavors.
> 
>     Classic Capitalist Exploitation is when equipment, software, and
>     education companies from rich countries sell inferior, broken, and
>     out-dated technology to poorer cultures because they can not sell the
>     out-dated technology in their own. This leaves the colonized with poor
>     technology, and with education in the use of inferior technology, when
>     it is critical that they learn modern engineering.
> 
>     The Vendor Territorialist attempts to lock significant segments of a
>     culture into using their hardware and/or software product. This is done
>     through low cost vendor-specific education, pressure on the government,
>     loss-leader initial entry cost, and making vendor-specific certification
>     important in the job market. A neat trick is to ignore piracy until the
>     colony is dependent on the sofware, see A Contribution to the
>     Understanding of Illegal Copying of Software. A new variant of this is
>     the social network with a do-gooder face and an embrace and devour body.
> 
>     Aid Agencies in the 'business' of technology transfer are subject to the
>     same diseases as business in general. At first, they have technology
>     transfer goals and are happy to cooperate with others to achieve them.
>     If they become 'successful', money flows to them, they grow, and they
>     become focused on their own growth and survival, losing sight of the
>     original primary goals. They see themselves as doing good, and succumb
>     to the American (and others') fallacy that bigger is better, and they
>     can do more good if they are bigger. After all, the need for their
>     services is perceived as effectively infinite. Others with whom they
>     used to cooperate are now seen as competitors for the resources of
>     self-expansion. They become protective of territory which they never
>     owned in the first place. The colonies become caught in the crossfire of
>     the foreign aid agencies, just as they became caught in the wars between
>     the classic colonialists.
> 
>     The Exploiting Hero brings, often inappropriate, technology in order to
>     gain leverage for personal power or money. They care little for the
>     locals or their needs. They have the righteous solution and will break
>     anything to insert it, take whatever they came for, and leave.
> 
>     The Agent represents others as opposed to introducing them. From a 2002
>     talk at Rhodes University, "Jose [Soriano] made it very clear to me
>     that, if I went to the Northern expert and asked the questions and then
>     returned the answers to Peru, this was a form of patronization and
>     colonialism. Jose and other Peruvians were first class citizens capable
>     of representing themselves. I was to introduce them to the experts and
>     get out of the middle. Brokering and hoarding information are a
>     dangerous form of techno-colonialism."
> 
>     Self-Exploitation is the saddest case, a person or group who is part of
>     the exploited and who starts to exploit their neighbors. This is
>     understandable as they are in a very resource scarce environment, and
>     see leadership as a path to general improvement, self-fulfillment, and
>     the power to improve things. Given the difficulty and complexity of
>     making any significant progress, they become controlling and defensive.
>     Though they speak of passing power to the next generations and to the
>     public, they soon cling to power with their claws, as does any
>     demagogue. Aside from the obvious damage, this breeds a public cultural
>     defense strategy of sabotaging anyone's success lest they become such
>     demagogues; thereby keeping everyone down.
> 
>     The Do-Gooder flies in, sings their song, drops a bit of technology and
>     flies out again. Back home, they stand in front of the cameras and
>     accept the accolades for their good deeds. The problem is that this
>     upstages the in-country folk on the ground who actually did the work;
>     and without credit for their work, the local folk have a hard time
>     getting independent support to do more work which is desperately needed.
> 
>     I speak from experience having been a do-gooder for 28 years, flying in
>     and back out, and accepting the accolades. I have donated used
>     equipment. I have helped to create organizations which became
>     self-perpetuating katamaris. Being a privileged brat from a rich
>     culture, I have yet to be a self-exploiter; but there is still time.
> 
>     A simple solution to this seemingly difficult problem will be presented
>     in our next paper. [ There seems to be no emoji for dripping sarcasm. ]
> 
>     Randy Bush <randy en psg.com <mailto:randy en psg.com>>
>     ---- cut here ----
> 
> 
>     --
>     Fernando Gont
>     SI6 Networks
>     e-mail: fgont en si6networks.com <mailto:fgont en si6networks.com>
>     PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _____________________________________________
>     Ietf-lac mailing list
>     Ietf-lac en lacnog.org <mailto:Ietf-lac en lacnog.org>
>     Cancelar suscripcion: ietf-lac-unsubscribe en lacnog.org
>     <mailto:ietf-lac-unsubscribe en lacnog.org>
> 
> 


-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont en si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492