[lacnog] Fwd: [dns-wg] Root KSK roll delayed
Carlos M. Martinez
carlosm3011 en gmail.com
Jue Sep 28 16:48:01 BRT 2017
Más info. Lectura interesante.
s2
/Carlos
Forwarded message:
> From: Matt Larson <matt en kahlerlarson.org>
> To: dns-wg en ripe.net
> Subject: [dns-wg] Root KSK roll delayed
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:52:41 -0700
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'm forwarding a message I just posted to dns-operations en dns-oarc.net
> announcing the postponement of the root KSK roll. Please excuse the
> posting from my personal email address: that's how I'm subscribed to
> this list and the only way to post in a timely fashion.
>
> As you can imagine, it's been a very busy past few days. We always
> intended to update all the relevant operational lists and are doing so
> now.
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: Matt Larson <matt.larson en icann.org>
>> Subject: Root KSK roll delayed
>> Date: September 28, 2017 at 9:47:14 AM PDT
>> To: dns-operations <dns-operations en dns-oarc.net>
>>
>> ICANN has decided to postpone the root KSK roll previously scheduled
>> for 11 October 2017 for at least one quarter. This message gives some
>> background and explanation for that decision.
>>
>> Historically there has been no way to determine which trust anchors
>> DNSSEC validators have configured, making it difficult to assess the
>> potential impact of the root KSK rollover. "Signaling Trust Anchor
>> Knowledge in DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)" (defined in RFC 8145)
>> is a recent protocol extension that allows a validator to report
>> which trust anchors it has configured for a zone to that zone's name
>> servers. The protocol was only finalized in April, 2017, and only the
>> most recent versions of BIND (9.10.5b1 and 9.11.0b3 and later) and
>> Unbound (1.6.4 and later) support it. This protocol was not expected
>> to have sufficient deployment to provide useful information for the
>> first root KSK rollover.
>>
>> However, initial research by Verisign and then by ICANN has found a
>> growing number of validators reporting trust anchor configuration to
>> the root servers. Based on data from six root server addresses,
>> approximately 12,000 unique source IP addresses have sent trust
>> anchor configuration reports so far in September 2017. The number
>> reporting is growing and now approaches 1400 unique addresses per
>> day. Significantly, approximately 5% of the total validators and
>> about 6%-8% on any given day report only KSK-2010, the root zone KSK
>> currently signing the root's DNSKEY RRset. These validators would not
>> resolve correctly after the planned root KSK roll.
>>
>> There are various reasons a validator might report only KSK-2010. One
>> reason is an old configuration with a statically configured trust
>> anchor (e.g., BIND's "trusted-key" statement). ICANN has always known
>> that a small percentage of validators would not be ready for the
>> rollover because they had manually configured their trust anchor, and
>> that operators of those validators would need to take action when the
>> root KSK rollover happened.
>>
>> Another reason is a failure to automatically update the trust anchor
>> using the RFC 5011 automated update protocol because of a software
>> defect, operator error or other reason. Based on our research and
>> preliminary investigation, we also believe it is possible that some
>> operators believe that they are ready for the rollover because they
>> configured their validator to use RFC 5011 automated updates, but
>> will not trust KSK-2017 when the rollover happens due to
>> configuration issues or software defects.
>>
>> Given the relatively high percentage of validators with just
>> KSK-2010, ICANN believes it is important to better understand the
>> reasons before proceeding with the root KSK roll. We will soon be
>> publishing the list of resolvers reporting only KSK-2010 and will ask
>> for the operational community's help in identifying, diagnosing and
>> correcting these systems.
>>
>> Throughout the project we have emphasized that the root KSK is being
>> rolled under normal operational conditions and have proceeded
>> cautiously and without haste. The decision to postpone was taken in
>> that spirit of caution because there is no operational pressure to
>> proceed given our continued confidence in the security of KSK-2010.
>>
>> We appreciate the community's understanding and we look forward to
>> your assistance in gathering the information necessary to move
>> forward with the root KSK roll.
>>
>> Matt
>> --
>> Matt Larson, VP of Research
>> ICANN Office of the CTO
>>
Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG