[lacnog] Es necesario asistir a las reuniones de IETF? (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08.txt)

Fernando Gont fgont en si6networks.com
Mar Nov 26 19:47:36 -02 2019

Un datapoint... nada que me sorprenda.

Luego escuchamos sanata y verso en esta lista.

Saludos para todos,

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:23:49 +0100
From: Ole Troan <otroan en employees.org>
To: Sander Steffann <sander en steffann.nl>
CC: Fernando Gont <fgont en si6networks.com>, 6man <6man en ietf.org>

>> What's the rationale for this document being "Informational"?
>> Documenting how folks are breaking the spec?
> For that I think an Independent Submission is the only appropriate one. Anything in any IETF stream should either stick to existing specs or explicitly update them.

A whole session at the IETF meeting in Singapore was spent on the topic
of header insertion in general and in the context of SR.
Progress was made.
I would encourage you to review that session.
Video recording is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJU0m1EhjaI

My reading of the working group session was to proceed work on both
drafts. With neither draft updating RFC8200.

Let's focus on communicating and understanding the positions of each
"camp" and proceed with the technical arguments.
I would discouarge "process arguments".
If you believe those are necessary, please take those with the chairs
and AD and we can summarize to the group.

Best regards,

Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG