[LAC-TF] Fwd: [v6ops] Deprecating 2002::/16 - 6to4 Historic Status

[Arturo Servin]

	Si no me equivoco esto es lo que se está discutiendo:

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic/

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-00

	Basicamente, lo hacemos obsoleto o lo arreglamos.

Saludos,
.as

On 6 Apr 2011, at 20:52, Azael Fernandez Alcantara wrote:

> Buen Dia,
> 
> He estado siguiendo los comentarios al respecto en la lista de la IETF, estuve en la pasada reunion y aun no hay una decision (redaccion) final, vamos a esperar y a opinar al respecto.
> Pero si hay que reconsiderar el uso de 6to4, de acuerdo al contexto, y a
> emitir recomendaciones al respecto.
> 
> Seria bueno saber el estado del uso de 6to4 en la region, ya que en la liga que mando Arturo Servin, no ubico a alguno en LA:
> http://stats.ottix.net/ipv6/
> 
> En nuesto caso, si lo hemos y continuado utilizando en algunos contextos.
> 
> SALUDOS
> ____________________________________
> Azael
> ___________________________________
> Mensaje enviado sin acentos
> 
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Nicolas Antoniello wrote:
> 
>> FYI
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Christopher Palmer <Christopher.Palmer at microsoft.com>
>> Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 19:43
>> Subject: [v6ops] Deprecating 2002::/16 - 6to4 Historic Status
>> To: "v6ops at ietf.org" <v6ops at ietf.org>
>> 
>> 
>> In  “Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to
>> Historic status”
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> There is this recommendation:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> IANA is requested to mark the 2002::/16 prefix as "deprecated",
>> 
>>  pointing to this document.  Reassignment of the prefix for any usage
>> 
>>  requires justification via an IETF Standards Action [RFC5226].
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It is not clear why this is necessary.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If major vendors were to disable 6to4 by default, that would fix the
>> brokenness issue, while still allow for this prefix to be used in
>> specialized or enthusiast scenarios. Isn’t any other action overkill?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> ----------------------------
>> 
>> Christopher.Palmer at Microsoft.com
>> 
>> Program Manager
>> 
>> IPv6 @ Windows
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> _______________________________________________
> LACTF mailing list
> LACTF at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lactf/attachments/20110407/f0bd3d4c/attachment.html>