[LAC-TF] Productos DHCP IPv6

[Erick Lobo Marín]

Hola Alejandro, aprovecho y te adjunto una presentación de kea.

Atentamente,
Erick Lobo
Costa Rica

lgD

2014-09-25 6:55 GMT-06:00 Erick Lobo Marín <erick.lobo at cgr.go.cr>:

> Muchas gracias,
>
> Atentamente,
> Erick Lobo
>
> lgD
>
> 2014-09-24 21:47 GMT-06:00 Alejandro Acosta <
> alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com>:
>
>>  Hola Erick,
>>   Me parece super buena la respuesta recibida de ISC..., solo me queda
>> decirte que en caso de que quieras/puedas compartir tu experiencia despues
>> seria genial!!. Yo he usado el ISC DHCP mas no conocia el Kea..
>>
>> Saludos y mucha suerte con la opcion que elijas!!,
>>
>> Alejandro,
>>
>> El 9/23/2014 a las #4, Erick Lobo Marín escribió:
>>
>> Copio respuesta de ISC:
>>
>>  2014-09-23 10:24 GMT-06:00 Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz at isc.org>:
>> On 23.09.2014 16:37, Erick Lobo Marín wrote:
>> > Hi, What alternative recommended for select DHCP in a Network
>> Enterprise:
>> >
>> > a) The roadmap ISC DHCP 4.3 .x
>> > b) The roadmap kea DHCP, currently in version 0.9 ?
>> Those two DHCP solutions are in radically different cycles.
>> ISC DHCP is an old, well proven software with lots of features and
>> history behind it. Its development is slower than Kea. ISC provides paid
>> support for ISC DHCP, if you need it. ISC DHCP supports failover for
>> DHCPv4, while Kea does not.
>>
>>  Kea is a new solution that officially haven't reached 1.0. ISC does not
>> offer support contract for it yet. It is in many cases much faster than
>> ISC DHCP. It has fewer features, but has some features that are not
>> present in ISC DHCP (e.g. hooks or lease storage in MySQL or Postgres).
>> As this is a relatively young software, it is sometimes a bit rough on
>> edges. On the other hand, it is being very actively developed.
>> Significant new features are added every release.
>>
>>  If you report a bug, it is more likely that Kea will be able to deliver
>> a fix faster. (That obviously depends on the severity of the bug. I'm
>> thinking about a typical bug, not a security issue).
>>
>>  So if you consider yourself an early adopter, you may want to take a
>> look at Kea. If you want to know current state of Kea capabilities, the
>> following 2 links could be useful:
>> http://kea.isc.org/wiki/KeaUpdate2 - May 2014
>> http://kea.isc.org/wiki/KeaUpdate3 - Set 2014
>>
>>  So it's really up to you and your specific preferences. Do you need to
>> keep your leases in MySQL? Use Kea. Do you need to do fancy client
>> management and access control? ISC DHCP will probably be better. Do you
>> plan to extend your DHCP server with your own logic, consult with
>> external database, log in some unusual way? Then perhaps hooks in Kea
>> are more appealing for you? Excited about new features being added
>> frequently? Pick Kea. Need stability with minimal changes? Pick ISC
>> DHCP, preferably ESV. Do you need host reservation? If yes, what is your
>> deployment timeframe? ISC DHCP supports it for a decade or more. Kea
>> will support it in upcoming 0.9.1, which is couple months away.
>>
>>  Need high performance? How big is your enterprise? How many leases/sec
>> or how many subnets you expect the server to be handling? Do you need
>> full failover? Maybe MySQL or Postgres high availability solutions will
>> be enough for you?
>>
>>  These are all questions you will need to answer yourself. My
>> recommendation is that you should get both, test them and see which one
>> works better for you.
>>
>>  Hope that helps,
>> Tomek
>>
>>  2014-09-23 14:29 GMT-06:00 Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz at isc.org>:
>> On 23/09/14 21:45, Erick Lobo Marín wrote:
>> > Hi Tomek, Very complete your response. A doubt:
>> > What is the extended support version (ESV) release?
>> See http://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/
>>
>>
>>  Atentamente,
>> Erick Lobo
>> Costa Rica
>>
>>  lgD
>>
>> El 22 de septiembre de 2014, 14:25, Erick Lobo Marín <
>> erick.lobo at cgr.go.cr> escribió:
>>
>>>  Hola,
>>>
>>>  Conocen alguna implementación "Kea DHCP versión 0.9  (también llamado
>>> BIND 10) "?
>>>
>>>  Lo han podido comparar con la versión más reciente del "ISC DHCP"?
>>>
>>>  Alguna experiencia, al respecto?
>>>
>>>  Muchas gracias,
>>>
>>>  Erick Lobo
>>> Costa Rica
>>> lgD
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LACTF mailing listLACTF at lacnic.nethttps://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
>> Cancelar suscripcion: lactf-unsubscribe at lacnic.net
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LACTF mailing list
>> LACTF at lacnic.net
>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
>> Cancelar suscripcion: lactf-unsubscribe at lacnic.net
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lactf/attachments/20140925/b5c020f0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kea-presentacion.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 816624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lactf/attachments/20140925/b5c020f0/attachment-0001.pdf>