[LAC-TF] Productos DHCP IPv6

Erick Lobo Marín erick.lobo at cgr.go.cr
Thu Sep 25 09:55:28 BRT 2014

Muchas gracias,

Erick Lobo


2014-09-24 21:47 GMT-06:00 Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com>

>  Hola Erick,
>   Me parece super buena la respuesta recibida de ISC..., solo me queda
> decirte que en caso de que quieras/puedas compartir tu experiencia despues
> seria genial!!. Yo he usado el ISC DHCP mas no conocia el Kea..
> Saludos y mucha suerte con la opcion que elijas!!,
> Alejandro,
> El 9/23/2014 a las #4, Erick Lobo Marín escribió:
> Copio respuesta de ISC:
>  2014-09-23 10:24 GMT-06:00 Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz at isc.org>:
> On 23.09.2014 16:37, Erick Lobo Marín wrote:
> > Hi, What alternative recommended for select DHCP in a Network Enterprise:
> >
> > a) The roadmap ISC DHCP 4.3 .x
> > b) The roadmap kea DHCP, currently in version 0.9 ?
> Those two DHCP solutions are in radically different cycles.
> ISC DHCP is an old, well proven software with lots of features and
> history behind it. Its development is slower than Kea. ISC provides paid
> support for ISC DHCP, if you need it. ISC DHCP supports failover for
> DHCPv4, while Kea does not.
>  Kea is a new solution that officially haven't reached 1.0. ISC does not
> offer support contract for it yet. It is in many cases much faster than
> ISC DHCP. It has fewer features, but has some features that are not
> present in ISC DHCP (e.g. hooks or lease storage in MySQL or Postgres).
> As this is a relatively young software, it is sometimes a bit rough on
> edges. On the other hand, it is being very actively developed.
> Significant new features are added every release.
>  If you report a bug, it is more likely that Kea will be able to deliver
> a fix faster. (That obviously depends on the severity of the bug. I'm
> thinking about a typical bug, not a security issue).
>  So if you consider yourself an early adopter, you may want to take a
> look at Kea. If you want to know current state of Kea capabilities, the
> following 2 links could be useful:
> http://kea.isc.org/wiki/KeaUpdate2 - May 2014
> http://kea.isc.org/wiki/KeaUpdate3 - Set 2014
>  So it's really up to you and your specific preferences. Do you need to
> keep your leases in MySQL? Use Kea. Do you need to do fancy client
> management and access control? ISC DHCP will probably be better. Do you
> plan to extend your DHCP server with your own logic, consult with
> external database, log in some unusual way? Then perhaps hooks in Kea
> are more appealing for you? Excited about new features being added
> frequently? Pick Kea. Need stability with minimal changes? Pick ISC
> DHCP, preferably ESV. Do you need host reservation? If yes, what is your
> deployment timeframe? ISC DHCP supports it for a decade or more. Kea
> will support it in upcoming 0.9.1, which is couple months away.
>  Need high performance? How big is your enterprise? How many leases/sec
> or how many subnets you expect the server to be handling? Do you need
> full failover? Maybe MySQL or Postgres high availability solutions will
> be enough for you?
>  These are all questions you will need to answer yourself. My
> recommendation is that you should get both, test them and see which one
> works better for you.
>  Hope that helps,
> Tomek
>  2014-09-23 14:29 GMT-06:00 Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz at isc.org>:
> On 23/09/14 21:45, Erick Lobo Marín wrote:
> > Hi Tomek, Very complete your response. A doubt:
> > What is the extended support version (ESV) release?
> See http://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/
>  Atentamente,
> Erick Lobo
> Costa Rica
>  lgD
> El 22 de septiembre de 2014, 14:25, Erick Lobo Marín <erick.lobo at cgr.go.cr
> > escribió:
>>  Hola,
>>  Conocen alguna implementación "Kea DHCP versión 0.9  (también llamado
>> BIND 10) "?
>>  Lo han podido comparar con la versión más reciente del "ISC DHCP"?
>>  Alguna experiencia, al respecto?
>>  Muchas gracias,
>>  Erick Lobo
>> Costa Rica
>> lgD
> _______________________________________________
> LACTF mailing listLACTF at lacnic.nethttps://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
> Cancelar suscripcion: lactf-unsubscribe at lacnic.net
> _______________________________________________
> LACTF mailing list
> LACTF at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lactf
> Cancelar suscripcion: lactf-unsubscribe at lacnic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lactf/attachments/20140925/5b047d2d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the LACTF mailing list