[LAC-TF] Sesion en IETF 95 (ERA: Re: implicaciones de declarar IPv4 historico)
fgont at si6networks.com
Thu Apr 7 13:47:59 BRT 2016
On 04/06/2016 08:21 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> It also means that new features will not be developed for IPv4 and
> possibly bugs at the protocol level (if discovered) will not be
> sorted out.
So essentially you're arguing that if a bug (e.g. with security
implications) were to be discovered for the protocol that makes the
Internet runs, we should leave the hole in?
That's quite a statement. And I'm curious of what the parties possibly
affected might think of us if we were to take that decision...
e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
More information about the LACTF