[LAC-TF] Uso de /64s en IPv6 (Fwd: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard)

Fernando Gont fgont at si6networks.com
Wed Feb 22 22:43:04 BRT 2017


Es la tercera vez en el trnascurso de una semana que escucho la palabra
"farsa" para referirse a actividades relacionadas con el 6man wg.

Alguno podría considerarlo un avance... :-)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version
6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:20:32 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
To: Job Snijders <job at ntt.net>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo at google.com>
CC: draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis at ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6 at ietf.org>,
IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, 6man-chairs at ietf.org

On 23/02/2017 03:41, Job Snijders wrote:
> Why publish a document that conflicts with (almost) every deployed
> global IPv6 backbone? This would be a farce.

Job is correct, and I think the document editor can find one of the
various proposed formulations that avoids the farce.

Nobody is saying that /64 isn't extremely widely used where it's
appropriate to have a portable fixed length IID. Set the default
at 64 and trust operators to change it where they need to.
That's realistic.


IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

More information about the LACTF mailing list