[LACNIC/Politicas] Fwd: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int

[raul at lacnic.net]

Marcelo:

En nuestra region no hay ninguna delegacion del ip6.int, por lo cual no
nos afecta. Igualmente hemos expresado nuestro acuerdo con el plan.

Saludos

Raul

> Hola,
>
> en RIPE se esta discutiendo este tema,
> alguna opinion al respecto para nuestra region?
>
> Saludos, marcelo
>
>
> Inicio mensaje reenviado:
>
>> De: Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org>
>> Fecha: 20 de julio de 2004 13:54:03 GMT+02:00
>> Para: ipv6-wg at ripe.net
>> Asunto: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa has finally been delegated and works as of today I
>> want to propose the end-day for ip6.int.
>>
>> ip6.int has been deprecated in favor of ip6.arpa for almost 3 years
>> already (RFC3152 dates August 2001) thus it is time to clean up the
>> mess. Vendors have been able to update their stacks for almost 3 years,
>> ip6.arpa has been deployed on production (read RIR) IPv6 space already
>> for quite some time too. Thus now, with 6bone also having a working
>> ip6.arpa tree this seems to be a perfect opportunity to start shutting
>> down ip6.int.
>>
>> At the moment only Cisco IOS and Windows XP don't have ip6.arpa
>> support,
>> but IOS has been addressed (they say) and Windows XP will be fixed with
>> SP2 due out per August. As neither of these are server OS's this
>> doesn't
>> pose much of a problem anyway. People using IPv6 need to keep their
>> systems up-to-date anyways.
>>
>> I propose that RIPE, and actually any other RIR, stops any delegations
>> for ip6.int per 9/9/2006. Which is more than 3 years after the RFC has
>> been released.
>>
>> Greets,
>>  Jeroen
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> http://www.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>