[LACNIC/Politicas] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Request for feedback: draft-weil-opsawg-provider-address-space-02

[Arturo Servin]

	FYI.

	Copio a la lista de políticas considerando que puede ser un tema interesante de discutir y/o seguir. 

Saludos,
.as


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Chris Donley <C.Donley at cablelabs.com>
> Date: 26 October 2010 17:37:35 CDT
> To: "opsawg at ietf.org" <opsawg at ietf.org>
> Cc: "Victor Kuarsingh \(victor.kuarsingh at rci.rogers.com\)" <victor.kuarsingh at rci.rogers.com>
> Subject: [OPSAWG] Request for feedback: draft-weil-opsawg-provider-address-space-02
> 
> Hello,
>  
> To support Service Provider deployments of NAT444 and 6RD, we are proposing that IANA reserve a /8 for shared transition space.  We believe that this will be a more efficient way of using the remaining unallocated IPv4 space. By sharing space for transition technologies, we believe that this will free up additional public addresses beyond a /8 that would otherwise be allocated to Service Providers for transition technologies.
>  
> We believe that we have incorporated your feedback on previous versions of our draft, and are interested in your feedback on our -02 version: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-weil-opsawg-provider-address-space/. In particular, do you support this draft becoming a WG item?
>  
> Thanks,
> Chris
>  
> Chris Donley
> CCIE, CISSP, SCiPM
> Project Director - Network Protocols
> CableLabs®
> 858 Coal Creek Circle
> Louisville, CO 80027
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg