[lacnog] Fwd: [v6ops] Deprecating 2002::/16 - 6to4 Historic Status

[Nicolas Antoniello]

FYI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Christopher Palmer <Christopher.Palmer en microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 19:43
Subject: [v6ops] Deprecating 2002::/16 - 6to4 Historic Status
To: "v6ops en ietf.org" <v6ops en ietf.org>


 In  “Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to
Historic status”



There is this recommendation:



IANA is requested to mark the 2002::/16 prefix as "deprecated",

   pointing to this document.  Reassignment of the prefix for any usage

   requires justification via an IETF Standards Action [RFC5226].



It is not clear why this is necessary.



If major vendors were to disable 6to4 by default, that would fix the
brokenness issue, while still allow for this prefix to be used in
specialized or enthusiast scenarios. Isn’t any other action overkill?



Thanks!

----------------------------

Christopher.Palmer en Microsoft.com

Program Manager

IPv6 @ Windows









_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops en ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20110406/8cd28d85/attachment.html>