[lacnog] Ipv6 classless? (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt)

[Fernando Gont]

Estimados,

FYI: Una propuesta para que IPv6 sea classless.

Saludos,
Fernando
Arzobispo de los Testigos de Maradona





---------- Mensaje reenviado ----------
De: <internet-drafts en ietf.org>
Fecha: 22/5/2017 13:25
Asunto: New Version Notification for
draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt
Para: "Job Snijders" <job en ntt.net>, "Randy Bush" <randy en psg.com>,
"Christopher Morrow" <morrowc en google.com>, "Fernando Gont" <
fgont en si6networks.com>, "Nick Hilliard" <nick en inex.ie>, "Geoff Huston" <
gih en apnic.net>, "Brian Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter en gmail.com>
Cc:


A new version of I-D, draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6
Revision:       00
Title:          IPv6 is Classless
Document date:  2017-05-22
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          7
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bourbaki-6man-
classless-ipv6-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bourbaki-6man-
classless-ipv6/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-
ipv6-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-
classless-ipv6-00


Abstract:
   Over the history of IPv6, various classful address models have been
   proposed, none of which has withstood the test of time.  The last
   remnant of IPv6 classful addressing is a rigid network interface
   identifier boundary at /64.  This document removes the fixed position
   of that boundary for interface addressing.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20170522/5c4918ff/attachment.html>