[lacnog] NTT now treats RPKI ROAs as IRR route(6)-objects

[Job Snijders]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 22:08, Alejandro Acosta <
alejandroacostaalamo en gmail.com> wrote:

>   First, congratulations and thanks for the info. From my point of view
> it’s a terrific approach.
>   Second, I got two questions while reading your email.
>
> 1. Since when are you doing this?, I mean, to know if you started
> yesterday or maybe you already have being doing this for some weeks and
> nothing strange have happened.



We started doing this 22 hours ago. We ran simulations beforehand to make
sure nothing strange would happen.


2. In case there is IRR and RPKI, which one has preference?


Currently RPKI and IRR have the same preference. The next step is to let
RPKI “drown out” or “overwrite” conflicting IRR information. IRR and RPKI
won’t remain equal. More news on that later this year.

Kind regards,

Job
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20180719/2546405e/attachment.html>