[lacnog] NTT now treats RPKI ROAs as IRR route(6)-objects

[Alejandro Acosta]

Thanks,


El 19/7/18 a las 22:25, Job Snijders escribió:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 22:08, Alejandro Acosta
> <alejandroacostaalamo en gmail.com
> <mailto:alejandroacostaalamo en gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>       First, congratulations and thanks for the info. From my point of
>     view
>     it’s a terrific approach.
>       Second, I got two questions while reading your email.
>
>     1. Since when are you doing this?, I mean, to know if you started
>     yesterday or maybe you already have being doing this for some
>     weeks and
>     nothing strange have happened.
>
>
>
> We started doing this 22 hours ago. We ran simulations beforehand to
> make sure nothing strange would happen. 
>
>
>     2. In case there is IRR and RPKI, which one has preference?
>
>
> Currently RPKI and IRR have the same preference. The next step is to
> let RPKI “drown out” or “overwrite” conflicting IRR information. IRR
> and RPKI won’t remain equal. More news on that later this year.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog

------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20180719/783ec22e/attachment.html>