[lacnog] [BCOP] BCOP Draft-2: open for comments
lucimara en cert.br
Mar Jun 19 12:54:56 BRT 2018
I will think about a better wording to make explicit the need for IPv6
in the BCOP.
On 19/06/18 05:02, Jan Zorz - ISOC wrote:
> On 18/06/2018 23:31, Lucimara Desiderá wrote:
>> 1) I think this is a bit out of scope of this document especially
>> because there is an specific BCOP for IPv6 requirements. (Maybe it is
>> time to update that).
> I tend to disagree. It's a prerequisite, not a requirement. Sort of like
> for a car, wheels would be a prerequisite, not a requirement. LED
> headlights can or can't be a requirement, but without wheels that's not
> a proper car anymore.
> Cheers, Jan
> BCOP mailing list
> BCOP en lacnog.org
Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG