[lacnog] USA to Mexico Fiber Internet Exchange Equipment Recommendations

Arturo Servin arturo.servin en gmail.com
Mie Mayo 15 16:37:39 -03 2019


Mike

I am not trying to defend or point to anyone. But I think that the problem
is that the current effort are not targeting the right people in the right
places.

Large ISPs and CDNs do not really need an IX to interchange traffic among
them, they need colo facilities.

For the small ones that might get an advantage from an IX the current ones
do not have the right ASNs there or are in the right places to attract CDNs
or large ISPs interested in connecting to small players.



On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:03 PM Michael De Leo (mdeleo) via LACNOG <
lacnog en lacnic.net> wrote:

>
>
>
> I work at Cisco and have tried to promote the creation of IXPs in the
> country, but there is a lot of politics from the incumbents. I would start
> with CUDI.
>
>
>
>
>
Regards
as
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20190515/01c1d420/attachment.html>


Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG