[lacnog] IETF I-D: "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" (Fwd: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops)

[Fernando Gont]

Estimad en s,

Se ha comenzado el Working Group Last Call (WGLC) the nuestro draft 
"Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" 
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01) 
-- pueden encontrar el texto del WGLC mas abajo.

Si tienen comentarios, por favor envienlos a la lista de correo del 
v6ops wg (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops).

De no ser posible, pueden enviarme los comentarios a mi, o enviarlos por 
esta lista, para discutir el tema en la lista.

P.S.: Se puede maridar este documento con 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3lF2qEA2cw

Saludos, y gracias!
Fernando




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:35:34 -0700
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf en gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops en ietf.org>

I'm opening a two week WGLC on 
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01.txt. This draft started in 
2015, and was set aside for a while. We took it as a working group draft 
in July with some additional authors, it has been recently updated in 
response to issues raised, and the question before the house is whether 
it is ready for archival state - to become an RFC. There are a number of 
questions:
   - do we agree with the language? (there are probably nits to be 
cleaned up)
   - do we agree with the concepts as stated?
   - do we agree with the direction the draft takes us?

I think the draft could use a thorough review, and having said that, am 
asking for volunteers. You don't have to tell me, per se; do the review 
and post it to the mailing list.

Two weeks gets us to November 2.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops en ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops