[lacnog] Fwd: AFRINIC And The Stability Of The Internet Number Registry System
Fernando Frediani
fhfrediani en gmail.com
Vie Ago 27 14:09:27 -03 2021
Hola todos
A continuación se muestra una declaración de John Curran, CEO de ARIN,
que explica de manera muy clara y objetiva el caso en disputa en AfriNic.
Es importante que todos los que sigan el área de recursos de numeración
comprendan la gravedad de este ataque contra AfriNic y de alguna manera
demuestren su apoyo para que el RIR pueda reanudar sus actividades con
normalidad.
En los últimos tiempos, los signos de mal uso indebido del
direccionamiento IP para actividades como alquilar por ejemplo ha
aumentado y es importante apoyar a los RIRs en el proceso de revisión
del uso para las asignaciones existentes, lo que garantiza que siempre
esté en línea con las políticas actuales y el contrato firmado previamente.
Saludos
Fernando
--------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [arin-ppml] AFRINIC And The Stability Of The Internet Number
Registry System
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:55:17 +0000
From: John Curran <jcurran en arin.net>
To: ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml en arin.net>
ARIN Community -
In response to questions about the dispute in the AFRINIC region, please
refer to the following article (link and text attached below –
<https://teamarin.net/2021/08/27/afrinic-and-the-stability-of-the-internet-number-registry-system/
<https://teamarin.net/2021/08/27/afrinic-and-the-stability-of-the-internet-number-registry-system/>>
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
===
August 27, 2021
AFRINIC And The Stability Of The Internet Number Registry System
By John Curran - President and CEO, American Registry for Internet
Numbers, Ltd. (ARIN)
As many in the community are aware, the Regional Internet Registry (RIR)
that serves Africa (AFRINIC) has been involved in litigation with a
company known as “Cloud Innovation” operating out of the Seychelles and
under control of an individual named Lu Heng (who resides primarily in
Hong Kong.) Disputes between RIRs and their customers do occur from time
to time, and it is best that such disputes are resolved within that RIR,
its community, and/or the applicable legal and courts system if necessary.
ARIN does not normally comment on disputes or related litigation
occurring at another RIR, but this matter has become quite different, as
it is both highly public and has potential for significant impact to the
overall stability of the Internet number registry system and thus to
ARIN and its community. Therefore, I address the ARIN community to
provide insight into the nature of the dispute, to highlight some
troublesome aspects of the ongoing litigation, and finally to
reiterate ARIN’s unwavering support to AFRINIC and the African
networking community.
The Dispute and Litigation
In 2020, AFRINIC completed a registry audit to confirm that number
resources were properly reflected in the registry; and as a result,
determined that it required additional information from Cloud Innovation
regarding its utilization of previously issued Internet number
resources. This sort of resource review is not uncommon among the RIRs,
and ARIN has its own resource review process that is similar in nature.
Upon reviewing the information provided by Cloud Innovation, AFRINIC
determined that the resources were not being utilized for the purposes
for which they were issued and noted that they would be revoked (after a
suitable time to allow customer migration off those resources.) Mr. Lu
and his businesses disputed AFRINIC’s authority to enforce this
provision of its customer agreement and instead engaged in several legal
actions in the courts in Mauritius to prevent having to return the
address blocks to AFRINIC.
As noted earlier, normally disputes are routine in nature and are
generally best resolved by the individual RIR, its community, and/or the
applicable legal & courts system. However, among the motions that Cloud
Innovation has made is one that currently freezes AFRINIC’s accounts and
thus has the potential to hamper AFRINIC’s operations and ability to
serve both the community in Africa as well as the global community that
relies upon the Internet number registry system. ARIN takes stability
of the Internet number registry system very seriously; and considering
this risk, we are compelled to provide this update to the ARIN community
as it needs to be aware of these developments and potential
implications. I must also share some of ARIN’s knowledge related to this
matter as it informs and directs our stance going forward.
Prior Dealings with ARIN
ARIN has first-hand experience and insight into Mr. Lu’s business
practices in seeking IP number resources. Mr. Lu, through Cloud
Innovation, Ltd., received 6.2 million IPv4 addresses from AFRINIC in
four different installments[1]; however, it is worth noting that in
2013,Mr. Lu, through his company Outside Heaven, Ltd., also approached
and sought over one million IPv4 addresses from ARIN. ARIN ultimately
refused to provide any resources to him and his business for two main
reasons: First, during the review of his application to justify the
provision of Internet number resources, Mr. Lu refused to provide ARIN
with information that was repeatedly requested on a number of occasions;
and second, the information provided by Mr. Lu was misleading and
inconsistent. In addition, Mr. Lu had no meaningful business
establishment in the ARIN region; and based on his own representations,
it was clear the intended use of the IPv4 addresses—if they were
issued—was for business activities outside the ARIN service region.
Given the seriousness of potentially false statements made to ARIN to
obtain number resources, ARIN attempted to engage in appropriate due
diligence with which Mr. Lu was unwilling to cooperate. ARIN refused
his application for IPv4 number resources.
Use of the AFRINIC Resources Out of Africa
ARIN has reviewed the utilization of the number resource blocks issued
by AFRINIC to Cloud Innovation and determined that the overwhelming
majority of the approximately 6.2 million IP addresses issued have not
been used within the African continent. While there are cases of
entire address blocks being routed from an ISP in South Africa, Cloud
Innovation also has announced more specific routes from ISPs in Hong
Kong and the United States. Because more specific announcements take
routing precedence, this rendered the routing announcement at the
South African ISP moot and resulted in the vast majority of the traffic
usage being outside of Africa. Such a result is not surprising as Cloud
Innovation has indicated that they predominantly “lease” the IP address
space to other parties rather than utilize it to provide connectivity
services directly.
It is apparent that Cloud Innovation’s use of the issued number
resources is not being used for the purpose for which they were issued;
and as such, it appears that AFRINIC is within its rights per the
registration services agreement to reclaim them so that they may be used
for the benefit of the African community. This is among the issues that
will need to be considered by the Mauritian court, as well as whether
there was fraud in the inception of the contractual process when the
resources were issued. Because AFRINIC is directly involved in the
litigation, it has quite properly limited its public comments on the
ongoing litigation with Mr. Lu and his companies. However, Mr. Lu, and
parties related to Mr. Lu, have not limited their actions to the courts
and have maintained a steady stream of confusing and inconsistent
misinformation to the public that apparently distorts the issues to cast
AFRINIC in a most unfavorable light. Neither the AFRINIC nor the ARIN
communities should expect a quick answer from the courts, but it will
ultimately yield a ruling. In the interim, as procedural motions are
being sorted out, the community should not make judgements about the
court proceeding until the substantive issues are addressed.
Joint RIR Stability Fund
The RIRs have committed to mutual assistance, in kind and financial, to
ensure operational continuity of the Internet number registry system;
and in 2015, the RIRs established a Joint RIR Stability Fund as a
prudent contingency measure towards long-term Internet number
registry stability. The Fund has been established through voluntary
pledges of funds from individual RIRs’ reserves, and upon an RIR’s duly
submitted request for support from the Stability Fund, the funds may be
made available to support that RIR’s registry and policy
development activities. There is in excess of $2M USD of financial
support collectively pledged from the RIRs for this purpose; and in
addition, support can also be provided in-kind (e.g.,
through operational staff for support of operational activities if needed.)
If AFRINIC requests support in accordance with the Joint RIR Stability
Fund, ARIN will support such a request. Furthermore, and without
reservation, ARIN stands by its unwavering commitment to support AFRINIC
and will take any and all measures necessary to ensure that neither the
African networking community, nor the global Internet number registry
system, is operationally impacted during this period. AFRINIC was formed
(and has accomplished so much) for the benefit of the African networking
community and ARIN stands with the community in dealing with those who
seek to disrupt or exploit it for their own benefit.
[1]
154.80.0.0/12 (Issued 07/24/2013)
45.192.0.0/12 (Issued 12/1/2014)
156.224.0.0/11 (Issued 12/22/2015)
154.192.0.0/11 (Issued 09/16/2016)
===
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20210827/8e627400/attachment.htm>
Más información sobre la lista de distribución LACNOG