[lacnog] IANA AS Numbers Registry Update

[Fernando Frediani]

Yes, that's what has been happening in the recent years with some RIRs 
as mentioned earlier. But that generates two entries in the IANA records 
instead of just one.
The point is to find out how the rate will stay for the coming years 
given the IPv4 exhaustion.

Fernando

On 15/12/2021 19:22, Sergio Rojas. . . wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
> Take in account that IANA policy has two criteria too allocate ASNs 
> numbers to RIRs.. so depending on the RIR case they can receive more 
> than 1024 ASNs. For more info you can read the two criteria in the 
> following link https://www.iana.org/help/inr-request-procedure
>
> Best,
>
> Sergio Rojas. . .
>
> El lun., 13 de diciembre de 2021 9:47 a. m., Carlos M. Martinez 
> <carlosm3011 en gmail.com> escribió:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     (I’m continuing the thread in English because it was started in
>     that language)
>
>     Even during the most active periods LACNIC may have to make two
>     ASN requests per year to IANA. This does not represent a big
>     burden either for LACNIC nor for IANA, as the process is quite
>     efficient and well understood by all parties.
>
>     It could be the case that for folks doing strict bogon-AS
>     filtering this could represent extra work, but  I would then
>     encourage operators doing this type of filtering to automate the
>     whole process using the IANA registry or LACNIC’s
>     delegated-extended file as the source of “non-bogon” ASNs for the
>     region.
>
>     /Carlos
>
>     On 13 Dec 2021, at 9:15, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
>
>     > https://stats.labs.lacnic.net/REGISTRO/asnxrirxano.html
>     >
>     > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:23 PM Tomas Lynch
>     <tomas.lynch en gmail.com> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> How many ASNs per year does LACNIC assign? That's all we have
>     to care about.
>     >>
>     >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 4:35 PM Fernando Frediani
>     <fhfrediani en gmail.com> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> Hello all
>     >>>
>     >>> I wanted to asked folks in general what they think about this
>     current
>     >>> Global Policy for ASN Assignment that does in blocks of 1024
>     ASNs for
>     >>> 32-bit ASNs.
>     >>>
>     >>> I am not sure about the current growth rate of ASN Allocation
>     in each
>     >>> RIR, but 1024 each time from first sight may seem a small
>     number given
>     >>> the quantity available for 32-bits.
>     >>>  From the other side though and correct me if I am wrong, it
>     seems that
>     >>> IANA smartly left an "Unallocated" range after each RIR in
>     order to
>     >>> avoid fragmentation so all new allocations to each RIR are
>     made from
>     >>> that range. For LACNIC for example there are still slightly
>     more than 50
>     >>> thousand ASNs available.
>     >>>  From IANA website is possible to see that some previous
>     allocations for
>     >>> LACNIC have been made in doubles.
>     >>>
>     >>> Therefore what do folks think about the current 1024 number
>     for these
>     >>> assignments if it is still suitable thinking ahead from now ?
>     >>>
>     >>> Thanks
>     >>> Regards
>     >>> Fernando Frediani
>     >>>
>     >>> On 08/12/2021 13:40, Selina Harrington wrote:
>     >>>> Hi,
>     >>>>
>     >>>> The IANA AS Numbers registry has been updated to reflect the
>     allocation of the following block to LACNIC:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> 272797-273820    Assigned by LACNIC 2021-12-07
>     >>>>
>     >>>> You can find the registry at:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/
>     >>>>
>     >>>> The allocation was made in accordance with the Policy for
>     Allocation of ASN Blocks to Regional Internet Registries:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/global-policy-asn-blocks-2010-09-21-en
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Best Regards,
>     >>>>
>     >>>> --
>     >>>> Selina Harrington
>     >>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> LACNOG mailing list
>     >>>> LACNOG en lacnic.net
>     >>>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>     >>>> Cancelar suscripcion:
>     https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> LACNOG mailing list
>     >>> LACNOG en lacnic.net
>     >>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>     >>> Cancelar suscripcion:
>     https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> LACNOG mailing list
>     >> LACNOG en lacnic.net
>     >> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>     >> Cancelar suscripcion:
>     https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > =====
>     > ^A.......o$
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > LACNOG mailing list
>     > LACNOG en lacnic.net
>     > https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>     > Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>     _______________________________________________
>     LACNOG mailing list
>     LACNOG en lacnic.net
>     https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>     Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion:https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20211226/67d9bb61/attachment.htm>