[LACNIC/Politicas] Pol í tica de publicaciones de bloques IPv6 (propuesta para modificacion de politica)

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

The point here is to recall what was the "summary" of the answers received
to this.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Roque Gagliano <rgaglian at antel.net.uy>
> Organización: ANTELDATA
> Responder a: <rgaglian at antel.net.uy>
> Fecha: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:31:17 -0300
> Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>, LACNIC Policy mailling list
> <politicas at lacnic.net>
> Asunto: Re: [LACNIC/Politicas] Pol í tica de publicaciones de bloques IPv6
> (propuesta para modificacion de politica)
> 
> Jordi, I am attaching the description of the problem we are dealing with
> that was published in NANOG's mailing list (Nicolas Antoniello's wrote
> it back in Jan.) just in case you want to check with some folks at the
> IETF meeting.
> 
> Roque
> 
> "-----------------------------------
> Hi,
> 
> This question is about the IPv6 section of ARIN Number Resource Policy
> Manual.
> 
>> From the manual (Section 6.5.1.1.c):
> 
> -----
> 6.5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria
> 
> c. Plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it will
> assign IPv6 address space, by advertising that connectivity through its
> single aggregated address allocation
> -----
> 
> We have a problem with this policy and we would like to know if any
> other 
> ISP experienced the same...
> 
> The problem raises when a RIR assign a /28 prefix (for example) to an
> ISP 
> which has 3 internet links with 3 different carriers (tier 1 carriers,
> for 
> example) using BGP publications.
> 
> Acording to ARIN (and most other RIRs) policy, the ISP must advertise
> through all the 3 links the /28 without the possibility of
> dissagregation. 
> The problem with this policy is that by doing this, the ISP loses
> control 
> of the traffic, not being able to distribute the traffic over the 3
> different links.
> 
> A /28 prefix may have a lot of incoming traffic associated to it, so I
> believe the dissagregation (subnets) of the prefix should be allowed by
> the policy.
> 
> What do you think? Do you have a similar problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> Nicolas Antoniello."
> 
> 
> 




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.