[LACNIC/Politicas] Next proposal to discuss: LAC-2007-01 Modifications to the IPv6 Prefix Initial Allocation Policy

[Antonio M. Moreiras]

Acho que o LACNIC poderia fazer essa recomendação (ou pelo menos nossa
comunidade poderia tentar chegar a um consenso sobre o assunto), mas não
na política de alocação. Talvez esse deveria ser um tema para discussão
na LACNOG ou LACTF.
--
I think that LACNIC could suggest that (or at least our community could
try to reach a consensus about it), but not at the allocation policy.
Maybe it should be a subject for discussion at LACNOG or LACTF.

[]s
Moreiras.

Em 26-04-2010 18:30, Carlos Marcelo Martinez Cagnazzo escreveu:
> We've discussed this in the past, and I basically agree with the
> policy proposal and with Moreiras's comment. However,  I keep
> wondering if RIRs should / should not suggest a minimum prefix length
> to be announced. Maybe it's too late to discuss this (Nicolas?), but I
> believe it could be worth giving it a thought.
> 
> regards
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Antonio M. Moreiras <moreiras at nic.br> wrote:
>> APNIC also reached consensus into a similar proposal in their last
>> meeting, it is on the final eight-week comment period now:
>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-082
>>
>> I agree with this proposal. Aggregation is a technical issue that should
>> be fostered by LACNIC, but not imposed by the allocation policy.
>>
>> Moreiras.
>>
>> Scott Leibrand escreveu:
>>> FYI, the ARIN community came to consensus and made a similar change
>>> last year:
>>>
>>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2009_7.html
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>>
>>> On Wed 4/7/2010 4:47 PM, Nicolas Antoniello wrote:
>>>> The next policy proposed for discussion is: "LAC-2007-01
>>>> Modifications to
>>>> the IPv6 Prefix Initial Allocation Policy".
>>>>
>>>> You may find the complete policy proposal at:
>>>> http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2007-01v3-propuesta-en.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are counting on each and every one of you to achieve consensus on
>>>> this
>>>> matter. For this, we would like to try to define the forum's position on
>>>> this policy before Friday April 16, 2010.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas Antoniello
>>>> Francisco Arias
>>>> LACNIC Public Policy Forum co-Chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Politicas mailing list
>> Politicas at lacnic.net
>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>>
> 
> 
>