[LACNIC/Politicas] [lacnog] Fwd: APNIC Announces its IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8

Azael Fernandez Alcantara azael at redes.unam.mx
Fri Apr 15 16:54:26 BRT 2011


Buenas Tardes,

Me parece importante este especificado este asunto, y asi evitar que otros 
agoten los recursos que son para una region en particular, aunque un mismo 
actor, tenga presencia local en varias regiones.

SALUDOS
____________________________________
Azael
UNAM
Mexico
___________________________________
Mensaje enviado sin acentos

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:

> Deberíamos tener una oración bien simple entre las políticas que diga
> claramente que las direcciones IP que asigna Lacnic son para usarse en
> nuestra región.
> Enviaré una propuesta.
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Nicolas Antoniello
> <nantoniello at gmail.com> wrote:
>> <chair hat = off>
>>
>> Todo es posible...
>>
>> Esa es una de las "alternativas" que en su momento algunos manejamos como
>> mecanismos que van en favor de una corrida de solicitud de direcciones IPv4
>> en nuestra región.
>> Además, el hecho de que en nuestra región no sea necesario disponer de
>> sistema autónomo (asignado por la propia LACNIC) para solicitar direcciones,
>> hasta podría facilitar (aunque solo sea un poco) esa alternativa.
>>
>> Con esto no digo que sea bueno exigir AS para solicitar direcciones IP...
>> sino que (en mi opinión) la ausencia podría simplificar la solicitud y el
>> uso de las direcciones.
>>
>> La pregunta podría formularse de esta manera:
>>
>> - Con las políticas actuales, que impide que alguien que NO tenga Sistema
>> Autónomo solicitado a LACNIC, haga un pedido de direcciones IP a LACNIC
>> (porque tiene una parte de la empresa radicada en la region de LACNIC) y
>> luego utilice esas direcciones publicándolas al mundo desde un AS de APNIC,
>> RIPE, ARIN o AFRINIC ???
>>
>> Saludos,
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:02, Christian O'Flaherty
>> <christian.oflaherty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Es posible que comiencen a radicarse empresas Asiaticas en Latam como
>>> proveedores de servicio de Internet para conseguir direcciones IPv4 de
>>> Lacnic? En algunos paises de nuestra región es muy simple radicar una
>>> empresa para hacer eso.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
>>> <carlosm3011 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> FYI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Axel Pawlik <no-reply at ripe.net>
>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:08 AM
>>>> Subject: APNIC Announces its IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8
>>>> To: ncc-announce at ripe.net, ripe-list at ripe.net, ncc-services-wg at ripe.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [Apologies for duplicate emails]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>
>>>> Today, Friday 15 April 2011, APNIC, the Regional Internet Registry
>>>> (RIR) for the Asia Pacific region, announced that it has distributed
>>>> the final IPv4 address space from its reserves of IPv4.
>>>>
>>>> This means that APNIC is now supplying IPv4 address space to its
>>>> members from the last /8 it holds according to the guidelines in
>>>> section 9.10 in "Policies for IPv4 address space management in the
>>>> Asia Pacific region":
>>>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy
>>>>
>>>> This event does not affect the RIPE NCC's reserves of IPv4 address
>>>> space and we will continue to distribute these resources to our
>>>> members on the basis of need until we reach the last /8.
>>>>
>>>> According to RIPE Document ripe-509, section 5.6, once the RIPE NCC
>>>> reaches the last /8 of IPv4 address space, each Local Internet
>>>> Registry (LIR) can receive one /22 (1024 IPv4 addresses) upon
>>>> application for IPv4 resources. In order to obtain this /22
>>>> allocation, the LIR must already have an IPv6 allocation and have a
>>>> demonstrated need for address space.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IPv6 - Act Now
>>>> ---------------
>>>>
>>>> The RIPE NCC cannot predict how long its own supply of IPv4 address
>>>> space will last and has worked for several years to inform all
>>>> stakeholders of the urgent need to deploy IPv6.
>>>>
>>>> It is now imperative that all stakeholders deploy IPv6 on their
>>>> networks to ensure the continuity of their online operations and the
>>>> long-term growth of the Internet.
>>>>
>>>> For more information on IPv6 and its deployment, advice from experts
>>>> and where to get training, please see:
>>>> www.ipv6actnow.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Further Information
>>>> --------------------
>>>>
>>>> For more information on IPv4 exhaustion, please see:
>>>> http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion
>>>>
>>>> For more information on how the RIPE NCC's last /8 will be
>>>> distributed, please see:
>>>> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509
>>>>
>>>> For information about the amount of IPv4 address space left in the
>>>> RIPE NCC's available pool of IPv4, please see the graph online at:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-pool-graph
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Axel Pawlik
>>>>
>>>> Managing Director
>>>> RIPE NCC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> =========================
>>>> Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
>>>> http://www.labs.lacnic.net
>>>> =========================
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LACNOG mailing list
>>>> LACNOG at lacnic.net
>>>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LACNOG mailing list
>>> LACNOG at lacnic.net
>>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>


More information about the Politicas mailing list