[LACNIC/Politicas] Host Sailor, Ltd.

[Carlos Vera]

Very clear Sergio!

Carlos Vera
Isoc Ecuador

Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry 10.
  Mensaje original  
De: Sergio Rojas. . .
Enviado: martes, 16 de agosto de 2016 15:39
Para: politicas at lacnic.net
Responder a: Lista para discusion de politicas de la comunidad de LACNIC
Asunto: Re: [LACNIC/Politicas] Host Sailor, Ltd.

Dear Mr. Guilmette,

According to the LACNIC policy, point 7.1, "LACNIC shall attempt to 
contact the organization and rectify the situation. If the situation 
cannot be rectified, LACNIC shall publish the resource that is to be 
recovered for a period of three months. During this period the 
organization may rectify the situation with LACNIC. After this period, 
the resource shall be recovered and therefore the records of the 
previous holder of the recovered resource shall be removed from LACNIC's 
database. LACNIC shall publish the resources that have been recovered so 
that the routing filters may be modified". Also, as it is established in 
the policy, everybody can check "resources under process of recovery" 
and "Recovered resources" at LACNIC´s website 
(http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/lacnic/revocacion-de-recursos)

Note that the breach in this case is the use of resources out of the region.

Best regards,

Sergio Rojas. . .


El 15/08/16 a las 18:22, Ronald F. Guilmette escribió:
> Mr. Rojas,
>
> Thank you for your timely reply.
>
> In message <4b469860-25c0-83b2-8f27-35f19fb281b6 at lacnic.net>,
> "Sergio Rojas. . ." <sergio at lacnic.net> wrote:
>
>> As we mentioned before, after your initial message we started our
>> process approaching the organization HostSailor to commence an inquiry
>> of the alleged use of the assigned resources outside of the LACNIC
>> region. If the results of our investigation confirm the alleged out of
>> region use, we would commence the revocation process of these resources,
>> according to our policies.
> Great! Can you tell me how long this review process typically takes?
>
> I don't need an exact figure, and I'm certainly not asking you for a
> "binding" estimate. I'd just like to get at least some ballpark sort
> of idea how long these things typically drag on for. Are we talking
> about a week? A month? Six months? Longer? If nothing seems to
> have changed in say, two weeks, would it be rude of me to make some
> follow-up inquiries at that point?
>
> I'm also wondering if you and your colleagues will even notify me, or
> anybody else, when your review of this matter has concluded, one way
> or the other. Will you? Whatever the outcome, I would certainly like
> to know when you and colleagues have concluded your review.
>
> To be clear, I *do not* want to rush your process in any way. That is
> the last thing in the world I would want. I want you and your colleagues
> to take all the time you need to perform your review carefully and
> professionally (as I am sure you will). But as you see, I have a
> passionate personal interest in this specific case, and thus, I
> certainly want to be informed when your review is concluded, regadless
> of the outcome.
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas

_______________________________________________
Politicas mailing list
Politicas at lacnic.net
https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas