[LACNIC/Politicas] FW: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Supporting IPv6 Deployment Through Policy

[Erik Vega]

Muy de acuerdo con Luciano, la realidades locales dan un buen punto de partida. 

Saludos. 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Politicas [mailto:politicas-bounces at lacnic.net] En nombre de Luciano Minuchin
Enviado el: martes, 11 de octubre de 2016 06:44 p.m.
Para: Lista para discusion de politicas de la comunidad de LACNIC
Asunto: Re: [LACNIC/Politicas] FW: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Supporting IPv6 Deployment Through Policy

Sumamente interesante creo que hay que seguir profundizando en el tema, entiendo que ya se esta mas próximo  a algunas realidades locales.

Saludos.
Luciano.

Saludos.
Luciano.

> El 11 oct. 2016, a las 17:30, Tomas Lynch <tomas.lynch at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:30 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ < 
> jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
> 
>> Este articulo expone, precisamente lo que he presentado al respecto 
>> de las propuestas de políticas de asignación de IPv6 para casos de gobiernos, etc.
>> 
>> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco_schmidt/supporting-ipv6-
>> deployment-through-policy
>> 
>> 
> Muy buen artículo. Definitivamente es útil tener una política que 
> contemple estos casos. Ahora me surgen nuevas dudas. El artículo 
> indica que "...we have created a team of dedicated IP Resource 
> Analysts to ensure that these kinds of requests are handled 
> efficiently". ¿Qué recursos tiene LACNIC para tener un equipo dedicado 
> a esto? ¿Será necesaria la creación de un grupo especializado? ¿Cómo impacta en los recursos?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Saludos,
>> Jordi
>> 
>> 
>> 
> Tomás Lynch
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre 
>> de Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> Responder a: <mschmidt at ripe.net>
>> Fecha: martes, 11 de octubre de 2016, 16:13
>> Para: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
>> Asunto: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Supporting IPv6 
>> Deployment Through Policy
>> 
>>    Dear colleagues,
>> 
>>    It was about a year ago that the RIPE community reached consensus 
>> on a policy proposal that introduced additional criteria for initial 
>> IPv6 allocations. We thought it was time to look back the origins of 
>> this proposal and see how the change has worked out since:
>>    https://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco_schmidt/supporting-ipv6-
>> deployment-through-policy
>> 
>>    Regards,
>> 
>>    Marco Schmidt
>>    Policy Development Officer
>>    RIPE NCC
>> 
>>    Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.consulintel.es
>> The IPv6 Company
>> 
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged 
>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
>> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be 
>> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
>> contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Politicas mailing list
>> Politicas at lacnic.net
>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
_______________________________________________
Politicas mailing list
Politicas at lacnic.net
https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas