[LACNIC/Politicas] Nueva versión de la propuesta LAC-2020-1

Wed Apr 7 11:08:53 -03 2021

Hola a todos,

Teniendo en cuenta los elementos siguientes:

- Hoy en día, no existe dificultad o falta de materiales o tutoriales para
una implementación mínima del protocolo IPv6. Si la empresa no lo sabe,
puede contratar a un técnico o un tercero.

- Si alguien tiene una necesidad urgente de sobrevivir a IPv4, es una señal
de que no hizo su homework.

- Si implementar IPv6 es una barrera o una molestia, algo anda mal.

- Desde mi punto de vista, las transferencias de bloques de IPv4 demuestran
un retraso en la adopción de IPv6, aunque las estadísticas muestran lo
contrario. Puede indicar un acto de desesperación por continuar con los
mecanismos y acomodaciones del CGNAT: "déjalo así, no hace falta que lo
toquemos".

- Internet depende de la colaboración de todos y un compromiso mínimo con
IPv6 en sus redes es fundamental para que todos puedan disfrutar de una
mejor experiencia de navegación para sus usuarios y un equilibrio para
Internet.

- el autor aclaró los puntos de duda y presentó una nueva versión muy clara
y objetiva.

Con eso, estoy de acuerdo con la propuesta.

Saludos a todos !

Henri Alves Godoy
Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas - FCA
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
Fone: +55 (19) 3701-6682

Em qua., 31 de mar. de 2021 às 11:37, <info-politicas at lacnic.net> escreveu:

> [Português abaixo]
> [English below]
>
> Estimados suscriptores de la lista de políticas de LACNIC,
>
> La propuesta LAC-2020-1 ha pasado de la versión 3 a la versión 4
>
> Título: Agregar IPv6 operativo como requisito para las transferencias de
> IPv4
>
> Resumen: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3
> meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space.
> Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased
> reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation
> of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the
> potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for
> organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18
> to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and
> that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to
> prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented
> network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant
> parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (
> https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment)
> reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space
> will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6
> deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting
> the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment
> of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
> In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4
> space, or the organization does not hold any IPv4 space the IPv6
> requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> Para ver el detalle ingrese en:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/sp
>
> Los cambios respecto a la versión anterior se pueden visualizar aquí:
>
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=4&v2=3&language=SP
>
> Los comentarios y los puntos de vista aportados por la comunidad son
> vitales para el correcto desarrollo del proceso de la propuestas
> - ¿Apoya usted o se opone a esta nueva versión de la propuesta?
> - ¿Ve alguna desventaja en esta nueva versión de la propuesta?
> - ¿Qué cambios podrían hacerse a esta nueva versión de la propuesta para
> que sea más eficaz?
>
>
> Por más información contacte a info-politicas at lacnic.net
> Saludos cordiales,
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Prezados assinantes da lista de políticas de LACNIC,
>
> A proposta LAC-2020-1 tem passado da versão 3 para a versão 4
>
> Título: Adicionar IPv6 operacional como requisito para as transferências
> do IPv4
>
> Resumo: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3
> meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space.
> Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased
> reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation
> of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the
> potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for
> organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18
> to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and
> that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to
> prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented
> network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant
> parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (
> https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment)
> reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space
> will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6
> deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting
> the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment
> of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
> In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4
> space, or the organization does not hold any IPv4 space the IPv6
> requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> Para ver o detalhe acesse:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/pt
>
> As alterações da versão anterior podem ser vistas aqui:
>
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=4&v2=3&language=PT
>
>  Os comentários e os pontos de vista aportados pela comunidade são
> vitais para o bom desenvolvimento do processo das propostas
> - Você está a favor ou em contra desta nova versão
>  da proposta?- Vê alguma desvantagem nesta nova versão
>  da proposta?
>
> - Que mudanças poderiam ser feitas à esta nova versão
>  da proposta para que seja mais eficaz?
>
> Por mais informações entre em contato conosco através do e-mail:
> info-politicas at lacnic.net.
>
> Atenciosamente,
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Dear LACNIC Policy List subscribers,
>
> Proposal LAC-2020-1 has been updated from version 3 to version 4
>
> Title: Add IPv6 operational as a requirement for IPv4 transfers
>
> Summary: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3
> meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space.
> Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased
> reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation
> of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the
> potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for
> organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18
> to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and
> that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to
> prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented
> network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant
> parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (
> https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment)
> reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space
> will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6
> deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting
> the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment
> of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
> In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4
> space, or the organization does not hold any IPv4 space the IPv6
> requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> To see the details, please click on:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/en
>
> The changes from the previous version can be seen here:
>
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=4&v2=3&language=EN
>
> The community's comments and opinions are essential to the proper
> functioning of the policy development process.
> - Do you support this new version of the proposal or are you against it?
> - Do you think this new version of the proposal has any drawbacks?
> - What changes could be made to this new version of the proposal to make
> it more effective?
>
> For further information, please contact info-politicas at lacnic.net
> Kind regards,
> --
> LACNIC - Registro de Direcciones de Internet para América Latina y Caribe
> Rambla Rep. de México 6125, CP 11400
>
> Montevideo-Uruguay
>
> Teléfono: +598 2604 22 22
> www.lacnic.net
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>

-- 
-- 
Henri Alves Godoy
Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas - FCA
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
Fone: (19) 3701-6682