[lacnog] IRR @LACNIC

[Ariel Weher]

I’ve just named the service IRR but totally agree on using new technologies
like RPKI and others mentioned in the presentations. My bad, sorry.

With these additions in mind, I’m more convinced that we need these
services running ASAP.

Cheers

On Wed, 2 May 2018 at 17:43 Job Snijders <job en ntt.net> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> As discussed in my presentation today I am not entirely sure whether a
> real "IRR" for LACNIC is the best path forward.
>
> In a way, a lot of the concepts in IRR are very old-fashioned compared
> to the reliablity of RPKI. I think it makes more sense to invest in
> porting the necessary features from IRR to RPKI (such as RPKI AS-Cones,
> perhaps more things are missing), than to take a step back in time and
> create an IRR database.
>
> If LACNIC (as a convenience service) offers an "IRR interface" to query
> the RPKI data, that of course can be useful for legacy tools. Reudiger
> Volk wrote an excellent opinion piece on related IRR/RPKI efforts in the
> ARIN region, and I think much of what is said there can be applied to
> the LACNIC region as well:
> https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/2018-April/001080.html
>
> Summary:
>
>     Please invest time and money to improve modern technologies (RPKI),
>     rather than invest in legacy technologies such as IRR!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
> _______________________________________________
> LACNOG mailing list
> LACNOG en lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
> Cancelar suscripcion: https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/options/lacnog
>
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://mail.lacnic.net/pipermail/lacnog/attachments/20180502/8c104d48/attachment-0001.html>